HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
C.N.Varadarajan – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner – Respondent
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner made a submission that the petitioner is not interested in persuing the writ petition and willing to withdraw the present writ petition and further persuing his remedy before the Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (Administration) Department.
2. The learned Government counsel appearing on behalf of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (Administration) Department made a submission that, in respect of the subject matter another writ petition viz., W.P.No.17920 of 2019 was filed by another petitioner and the said writ petition has also been withdrawn on 06.09.2021. Thus, it is contended that several persons are filing writ petitions on the same subject based on some collusion between the parties. They file the writ petition and withdraw the same in a casual manner and such an approach of the litigants can never be encouraged.
3. This Court is of the considered opinion that the litigants who are approaching the High Court is expected to file petitions with responsibility and casual approach by the litigants at no circumstances be encouraged by the High Court. It is not as if they can file a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.