HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
VIDHYA.J – Appellant
Versus
THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENE – Respondent
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
2.The petitioner's husband is presently confined in Central Prison, Madurai. The petitioner alleges that she has been denied permission to meet her husband. The representation sent by her in this regard did not elicit any response. Hence, this writ petition came to be filed.
3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner's husband is involved in as many as ten cases. Out of them, one is a murder case. The petitioner's husband was originally confined in Puzhal Central Prison, Chennai. On account of his misbehavior, he was transferred to Madurai Central Prison. Even in Madurai Central Prison, he continued to indulge in unruly conduct and that is why, he has been debarred from receiving visitors for one month. The said period would expire on 06.12.2021. The petitioner's husband is free to receive visitors thereafter as per the rules set out in Tamil Nadu Prison Manual.
4.The petitioner is said to be seven months' pregnant. She is desirous of meeting her husband. The question that falls f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.