SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 47564

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
VIDHYA.J – Appellant
Versus
THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENE – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

2.The petitioner's husband is presently confined in Central Prison, Madurai. The petitioner alleges that she has been denied permission to meet her husband. The representation sent by her in this regard did not elicit any response. Hence, this writ petition came to be filed.

3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner's husband is involved in as many as ten cases. Out of them, one is a murder case. The petitioner's husband was originally confined in Puzhal Central Prison, Chennai. On account of his misbehavior, he was transferred to Madurai Central Prison. Even in Madurai Central Prison, he continued to indulge in unruly conduct and that is why, he has been debarred from receiving visitors for one month. The said period would expire on 06.12.2021. The petitioner's husband is free to receive visitors thereafter as per the rules set out in Tamil Nadu Prison Manual.

4.The petitioner is said to be seven months' pregnant. She is desirous of meeting her husband. The question that falls f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top