SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 12159

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR
A.S.Senthil kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep by – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

These Writ Petitions are filed under Section 226 of Constitution of India, to direct the 1st respondent to consider the representation dated

08.04.2022 to compound the offence under Section 5A of TNPID Act.

2.It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that at the time of initial process, an an ad-interim attachment value of the properties was only Rs.41 crores. Now the value has been raised and the present value is more than Rs.110 crores and they are ready to compound the offence if the properties are sold out.

3.Mrs.P.S.Leela Alex, the District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore appeared before this Court and submitted that they have already filed applications before the trial Court in O.A.No.03 of 2014, O.A.Nos.11, 23 and 34 of 2015, O.A.No.27 of 2016, O.A.No.21 of 2017 and O.A.No.06 of 2020 in respect of final attachment of the properties.

4.It is the contention of the learned counsel for the respondent that during the pendency of the writ petition, the trial Court has not passed any final attachment order and only after the final attachment order of the trial Court, they can go for further proceedings and call bid for sale of the property.

5.Section 4(3) of Tamil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top