SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 18388

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
M/S.VISWAPRIYA INDIA LTD – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP BY DEPUTY SUPERINT – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

These three Revision Cases arise out of the same case in C.C.No.6 of

2020 and are filed against the order of framing of charges and as such are taken up and disposed off by this common order. Crl.R.C.No.1237 of 2022 is filed by the accused No.1, while, Crl.R.C.No.1242 of 2022 is filed by the accused Nos.18, 19, 20, 21, 26, 28 and 31. Crl.R.C.No.1278 of 2022 is filed by the accused No.10.

2. Though Crl.R.C.No.1237 of 2022 was filed through a learned Counsel, R.Subramanian, Director, appeared in person and submitted that he has already revoked Vakalath and argued in person, the same Mr. R.Subramanian argued as learned Counsel in respect of the other two revisions. Heard Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent in both the Revision Cases and Mr.C.Arun Kumar seeking to intervene in the matter on behalf of the victim depositors.

3. Mr.R.Subramanian, party-in-person appearing in Crl.R.C.No.1237 of 2022, would submit that in this case, copies were furnished to him on 16.02.2022, but, however, charges were also framed on the very same date and therefore, he could not make any submissions at the time of framing of charges. He would submit that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top