SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 43412

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M. SUNDAR
M/s.Ramaniyam Real Estate Pvt.Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Gunda Ramani – Respondent


JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.Sundar, J.

This common order will now dispose of the captioned main 'Original Side Appeal' (hereinafter 'OSA' for the sake of brevity) and captioned 'Civil Miscellaneous Petition' (hereinafter 'CMP' for the sake of brevity) thereat.

2. In the hearing before us, Mr.S.Sundaresan, learned counsel for appellant in OSA/petitioner in CMP, Mr.V.Raghavachari, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.SK.Rahul Vivek, counsel on record for contesting respondents 1 to 4 and Mr.C.Selvaraj, learned Additional Government Pleader for official respondent i.e., R5/ jurisdictional Sub Registrar are before us. To be noted, State counsel is only a formal party as State is not a party to the litigation.

3. After hearing the matter for some time, learned counsel for appellant and learned senior counsel for respondents 1 to 4 took a very fair approach to the matter and therefore it is really not necessary to set out facts in great detail. Factual matrix in a nut shell i.e., short facts shorn of elaboration or in other words, short facts imperative for appreciating this simple order will suffice.

4. Short facts are that the appellant company before us f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top