SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 15328

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J
Sathyanarayanan – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar – Respondent


ORDER

Challenge has been made to the refusal slip issued by the respondent refusing to register the power of attorney presented by the petitioner on the ground that there is no previous document and also the property belongs to the temple.

2. It is the case of the writ petitioner that the property measuring 4240 sq.ft., comprised in Old Survey No.154/3, T.S.No.8983, Block No.130 of T.Nagar Village, Mambalam Guindy Taluk, Chennai District belonged to one Mr.K.V.Panchatcharaiyer and the said property was transferred to one Lakshmikanthammal vide transfer deed dated 31.01.1959, leaving behind her only daughter namely Bharathiammal, who also obtained a Ryotwari Patta in her name issued by the Tahsildar, Mambalam Taluk vide C.A.No.330/1986. She died on 05.03.2005, leaving behind her daughters Mrs.Ranibai @ Rani, Mrs.Rosibai, Mrs.Karthikeyani @ Sampathkumari, Mrs.Kalavathy and her son, the petitioner. They are in the absolute possession and enjoyment of the property with 1/5th share each. When all of them executed a power of attorney dated 13.10.2022 in favour of one P.Ayyappa Rao and sought to register, the same was refused to be registered on the ground that the property belonged to temp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top