ORDER

No representation on behalf of the petitioner.

The petitioner has challenged this writ petition to call for the records in G.O.Ms.No.5, Cooperative, Food and Consumer Protection Department, dated 20.01.2020 issued by the 1st respondent and letter in Na.Ka.No.70538/2017/Thikakupal dated 22.01.2020 issued by the 2nd respondent.

3.Prima facie it appears that the issue is now covered against the petitioner in terms of the order dated 14.05.2022 in W.P.Nos.23369 and

25287 of 2021. The operative portion of the order reads as under:-

“38. If we look at the principle enunciated in the aforestated cases, it would make abundantly clear that, the scope of judicial review on policy matters are very limited. Moreover, whether a particular type of training Institute is required for the state or not is necessarily a policy decision to be taken, of course on the basis of the expert views given in this regard, by the State Government. Like that, such kind of training institute should be at the State level or National level also again be the policy decision to be taken by the State Government.

39. If at all, a policy decision already been taken by the State Government to establish a State level Trai