SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 18675

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
Mr.R.Senthilnathan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamilnadu – Respondent


ORDER

The writ petitioner was appointed as Sub-Inspectors of Police during the year 2008 and was sent for one year statutory training which ended on 17.01.2009 and posted in Category II/Armed Reserve.

2. The petitioner states that he is entitled for conversion from Armed Reserve to Law and Order category as per the Government Policy. The cases of similarly placed persons working in the cadre of Sub-Inspectors were considered positively by the respondents and now they are serving as Sub-Inspectors in the Law and Order category and the case of the writ petitioner was not considered merely on the ground that he suffered punishment of censure.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that as regards unblemished record of service, none of the punishment is in currency as of now and the punishments awarded expired long back and thus, there is no impediment for considering the case of the writ petitioner for grant of conversion to the Law and Order category.

4. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents objected the said contention by stating that the terms and conditions stipulated in the Government Orders are to be complied with for conversio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top