SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 16570

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice V. SIVAGNANAM
D.Vairavel – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Police – Respondent


ORDER

This criminal original petition is filed to direct the second respondent not to harass the Petitioners under the guise of enquiry on the foisted complaint of the respondents 3 and 4.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners had business transactions with the private respondents. In that regard, some dispute was arisen between them, so that the private respondents lodged a complaint against the petitioners. Based on that, the second respondent is harassing the petitioners. Hence this petition has been filed.

3.The learned Counsel appearing for the respondents 3 and 4 submitted that in this case, the third respondent is the defacto complainant and he is doing whole sale dhal business and the petitioners purchased dhal from him. In that transaction, the petitioners had to pay a sum of Rs.26,29,400/-. While demanding that amount, the petitioners threatened that they will commit suicide and also threatened with rowdy elements. Therefore, in order to get back that amount, he gave a complaint to the second respondent. The petitioners and the private respondents appeared for enquiry and the petitioners gave an undertaking stating that they are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top