SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 2990

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice N.SATHISH KUMAR
THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR LA. – Appellant
Versus
SESHAMMAL – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Aggrieved over the order of the Tribunal enhancing the compensation from Rs.256/- per cent to Rs.1,200/- per cent, the present appeal suit came to be filed.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to herein, as per their rank before the Trial Court.

3.The brief facts, leading to the filing of this Appeal Suit, are as follows:-

(i) Total extent of 71.86.0 Hectares of Ryotwari Land was acquired at Melamadai Village in Sattur Taluk, Virudhunagar District for the purpose of constructing a reservoir under Irukkangudi Reservoir Scheme. The claimant is the owner of one of the properties acquired for the said purpose in Survey No.411/1B for an extent of 0.76.0 hectares. The Land Acquisition Officer fixed the value of the property at the rate of Rs.256/- per cent. Thereafter, the matter has been referred to the Tribunal under Section 18(1) of the Act as the claimants have claimed Rs.15,000/- per cent as compensation.

(ii) Before the Tribunal, on the side of the claimant, C.W.1 to C.W.4 were examined and Exs.C1 to C4 were marked and on the side of the respondent R.W.1 was examined and Exs.R1 to R6 were marked.

4. The Land Acquisition Tribunal after considering both the do

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top