SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 11175

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN
SUDHAKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP BY – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

This Criminal Appeal has been filed against the Judgment dated

29.01.2020 made in Spl.S.C.No.15 of 2018 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

2. The respondent police registered the case against the appellant (A-1) in Crime No.14 of 2017 for the offence under Section 366 (A) IPC and under Section 5(l), 5(n) read with 6 of POCSO Act, 2012. After investigation, respondent police laid the charge sheet before the Special Court/Fast Track Court, Krishnagir. Since the offence against women particularly child and coming under the POCSO Act, learned Special Judge, after completing formalities, framed charges against the appellant/A-1 u/s.5(l) read with 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 and under Section 366 IPC. Yet nd another charge was framed against the 2 accused for the offence u/s.366 A IPC. After framing charges, during the trial, in order to prove the case of the prosecution, on the side of prosecution, as many as 16 witnesses were examined as P.Ws.1 to 16 and 27 documents were marked as Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.27 besides one material object has been marked. After completing the examination of the prosecution witnesses, incrimi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top