SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 23988

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
K.THULASINGAMOORTHY – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent


ORDER

This petition is filed to call for records in C.C.No.103 of 2008 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Poonamallee and quash the same.

2. Final report in C.C.No.103 of 2008 was filed on the basis of the complaint of the defacto complainant dated 30.07.2007. The defacto complainant is the second respondent in this case. The case of the second respondent is that he is a practising Advocate, he purchased two plots in Sivappoothamedu village, Vanagaram, Chennai in Plot Nos.21 and 22 in S.No.83/2 totally measring 3150 sq.ft from one K.Thulasinga Moorthy on 03.05.2002. The sale consideration was Rs.80,000/-. At the time of registration, the sale deed was kept pending for registration due to want of NOC. Second respondent filed Writ Petition before this Court and got order releasing the sale deed. On 15.07.2007 at about 3pm, Thulasinga Moorthy, his brother-in-law A.Balamurugan and one Venkatesan along with 5 others trespassed into his plots with deadly weapons. Second respondent came to know that Thulasinga Moorthy created forged documents after his purchase. He created documents in favour of his wife Tmt.Pushpa and brother-in-law Balamurugan for the same plot Nos.21 a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top