SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 38983

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice N.SATHISH KUMAR
Siddarth C S – Appellant
Versus
The Director – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

Since the issues involved in both the Writ Petitions are one and the same, both the Writ Petitions are taken up together, heard and disposed of by this common order.

2. These Writ Petitions have been filed seeking for issuance of a Writ of Declaration to declare the Detailed Development Plan - Bye pass Road, Detailed Development Plan No.V, Tiruchirappalli Corporation, Tiruchirappalli Local Planning Area, got lapsed and further direct the 3rd Respondent herein to cancel the Gift Deeds dated 21.02.2014 and 10.03.2015 bearing Doc.No.825/2014 and Doc.No.880/2015, in Book No.1, in the office of the 5th Respondent in so far as it relates to item Nos.1 and 2 mentioned therein and thereby release such lands as provided under Section 38 of the “Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971” (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).

3. It is the case of the Writ Petitioner that the subject property belonged to the petitioner's family concern. The subject properties are notified for the Detailed Development Plant No.V, Tiruchirappallai Corporation, Tiruchirppalli Local Planning Area under Section 37 the Act. According to the petitioner, the subject lands have not been acquired withi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top