SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 17435

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI
P.ILANCHEZHIAN – Appellant
Versus
D.MANOHARAN – Respondent


ORDER

This petition has been filed against the order passed in C.A.No.7 of 2018 dated 22.01.2019, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul.

2.The respondent has filed a complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act against the petitioner/accused and the same was taken on file as C.C.No.210 of 2007 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai. The case ended in acquitted. Against the same, the respondent has filed an appeal in Crl.A.No.7 of 2018 before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul. The appeal was allowed and the case in C.C.No.210 of 2007 was remanded back to the trial Court for further enquiry. Against the same, the petitioner has preferred this Criminal Revision Case.

3.On the side of the petitioner, it is stated that the claim of the respondent is that the revision petitioner borrowed a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh and Fifty Thousand only) from the respondent. To repay the same, he executed a dated cheque 30.04.2007, for a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh and Fifty Lakhs only) on 09.12.2006 and the cheque was returned as “insufficient funds”. The respondent failed to prove that notice was served on the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top