SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 13620

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice P. N. PRAKASH
INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Appellant
Versus
ASHOKKUMAR – Respondent


COMMON JUDGMENT

P.N. PRAKASH, J.

For the sake of anonymity, the deceased in this case, who is a minor girl, is referred to as “X”.

2 Shorn off unnecessary frills, the germane facts leading to the institution of the referred trial and criminal appeal run thus:

2.1 “X” was 13 years old when her life ebbed out. She was the daughter of Malar (P.W.1) and Munusamy. Apart from “X”, Malar (P.W.1) has a daughter, Divya (P.W.2) and a son Arul Kumar (P.W.3) and both were elder to “X”. Divya (P.W.2) got married to one Velmurugan, through whom, she has a child named Koteeswari, who was around three years old at the time of the incident. All of them were living together under one roof, viz., Door No.2/316, Lenin Nagar 1st Street, Alathur Village, Kancheepuram.

2.2 “X” was studying in IX standard in the Government Higher Secondary School, Payyanur and according to the school records (Ex.P.22), her date of birth is 11.11.2003 [See the evidence of Kamakshi (P.W.23), Headmistress of the school].

2.3 The appellant herein also hails from the same village, but, is a resident of Gangai Amman Koil Street nearby and was well-known to the family of “X”.

2.4 The incident in this case took place on 23.07.2017 (Sund

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top