SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 14981

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR
Pasupathi Murugan. M – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned order passed by the sixth respondent in Na.Ka.A1/1917/2022, dated 10.06.2022 and consequently, directing the first respondent to pass orders on the representation of the petitioner, dated 23.05.2022 following Rule 9, Tamil Nadu Retail Vending (In Shops and Bars) Rules, 2003 amended and notified by G.O.Ms.No.17, dated

13.02.2022.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that there was an existing TASMAC shop in Shop No.12027 in Thangathirupathi Nagar. The said shop in business for more than 10 years in Plot No.108. Now, the respondents taken steps to shift the TASMAC to the housing plot in Plot No.98 A in the very same layout. Plot No.108 as well as Plot No.98 A are sold as residential plots. Plot No.98 A was sold to the seventh respondent. Further, the seventh respondent obtained a planning permission from the President of Vadugapatti Panchayat on 22.04.2022 for construction of residential building. Now, contrary to the planning permission obtained for commercial purpose shop is let out. More so, TASMAC is decided to open a wine shop in the midst of the residential locality having various objections, it is cause of concern for the saf

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top