HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
SARASWATHY – Appellant
Versus
STATE REPBY – Respondent
ORDER
This petition had been filed to call for the records relating to C.C.No.1 of 2012 on the file of the Special Court for Land Grabbing Cases, Erode and to quash the same.
2.The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner filed a petition to quash the charge sheet pending on the file of the Learned Special Court for Land Grabbing Cases, Erode, in C.C.No.1 of 2012.
3. At the time of admission on 21.01.2022, the Presiding Learned Single Judge had ordered notice to the second Respondent by 16.02.2022 but had not stayed the case pending trial.
4. Now, the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner invited the attention of this Court to the Additional Typed Set and submitted that PW1/Complainant herself had turned hostile witness during trial and furnished the copy, which is not a certified copy. Therefore, this Court cannot pass any order based on the fact that PW1 is the hostile witness.
5. The Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
vehemently objects the submission of the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, stating that in the case registered by the Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Erode, investigation was completed and final report laid before the Special Court for Land Grabbing
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.