SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 20503

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Mercedes-Benz – Appellant
Versus
Abhinav Constructions – Respondent



The court emphasized the validity and applicability of arbitration clauses in financial agreements for settling disputes.

Headnote:

Arbitration - Loan Agreement - Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 11(6) - Summary of Act and Court's Interpretation

Fact of the Case:

A petition was filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint an Arbitrator due to disputes arising from a Loan cum Hypothecation cum Guarantee Agreement, following defaults in repayment by the respondents.

Issues: Whether the disputes arising from the Loan cum Hypothecation cum Guarantee Agreement are subject to arbitration under the specified clauses.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the applicant had met the necessary criteria for the appointment of an arbitrator as per the agreements and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Final Decision: The Arbitration Original Petition was allowed and an Arbitrator was appointed.

ORDER

This Arbitration Original Petition has been filed under Section

11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, referred to as the Act') to appoint an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the differences and disputes between the parties under the said Loan cum Hypothecation cum Guarantee Agreement dated 31.10.2019 along with Supplemental Agreements dated 13.10.2021 & 16.06.2023 in respect of contract bearing Nos.20144841, 20144842, 20144843, 20144844, 20144845 and 20144846.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the petitioner-

company is rendering financial assistance for its prospective commercial business as well as individual customers i.e., by loan cum hypothecation agreement. The respondents have approached the petitioner-company for loan facility for the purpose of purchasing a vehicle viz., Bharat Benz BB HDT 2528C 16 cum vehicle. The first respondent as borrower along with the second respondent as co-borrower and third respondent as Guarantor entered into a Loan cum Hypothecation cum Guarantee Agreement dated 31.10.2019 and supplemental agreements dated 13.10.2021 & 16.06.2023 with the petitioner. Pursuant to which, the aforesaid agreements were executed and the amount was paid to the respondents. However, the respondents have committed default in repayment of loan amount along with interest as per the terms of above said loan agreements. Therefore, the petitioner on 21.03.2024 issued notice under Section 21 of the Act, calling upon the respondents to repay a sum of Rs.2,66,54,028/- along with interest. Despite the service of notice on the respondents, the respondents have failed to settle the aforesaid dues. Therefore, finding no other option, the petitioner has filed the present O.P., for appointment of Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute arisen out of the Loan cum Hypothecation cum Guarantee Agreement dated 31.10.2019 and supplemental agreements dated 13.10.2021 & 16.06.2023.

3. Ms.S.R.N.Manusri, learned counsel entered appearance on behalf of the respondents would submit that she has no objection for appointment of the Arbitrator.

4. Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

5. Upon hearing the learned counsel and on perusal of the records, this Court is of the considered view that the present dispute has arisen out of the Loan Agreement dated 31.10.2019 and Supplemental agreements dated 13.10.2021 & & 16.06.2023, and the same is arbitrable in terms of Clause 85 of the Loan Agreement dated 31.10.2019 and Clause 27 of the Loan cum Hypothecation cum Guarantee Agreement dated 31.10.2019. Relevant arbitration Clauses contained in the loan agreement dated 31.10.2019, which reads as follows:

“The Clause 85 of the Loan Agreement dated 31.10.2019 is as follows:

"All claims and disputes arising under or relating to this loan agreement are to be settled by binding arbitration in the state of Tamil Nadu, specifically Chennai or another location as desired by the lender. The arbitration shall be conducted on a confidential basis and shall be subject to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 of India. Any decision or award as a result of any such arbitration proceedings shall be in writing and shall provide an explanation for all conclusions of law and fact and shall include the assessment of costs, expenses and reasonable attorney's fees. Any such arbitration shall be conducted by single arbitrator appointed by the lender. The arbitration proceeds shall include a written record of the arbitration hearing. The Parties reserve the right to object to any individual who shall be employed by or affiliated with a competing organization or entity. An award of arbitration may be confirmed in a court of competent jurisdiction".

The Clause 27 of the Deed of Guarantee dated 31.10.2019 is as follows:

"All claims and disputes arising under or relating to this loan agreement are to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top