SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 21824

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Mrs Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
K.VASANTHA – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent



Senior citizens have the right to seek maintenance from their children under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

Headnote:

Maintenance - Senior Citizens - Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Sections 1, 2, 4, and 5 - The Act mandates provisions for the maintenance of senior citizens and the obligation of children to care for them, influencing the court's directive for timely action on the petitioner's representation.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a senior citizen, filed a complaint under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, against his sons for not providing necessary care after transferring property to them, seeking action on his representation regarding cancellation of the settlement deed.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the second respondent to prioritize the petitioner's case, conduct an enquiry, and dispose of the case within specified timeframes, emphasizing the need for timely legal recourse for senior citizens.

Issues: Whether the second respondent is obliged to consider and act upon the petitioner's representation under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that due consideration must be given to the rights of senior citizens to seek maintenance and welfare under the applicable law, ensuring their grievances are addressed promptly.

Final Decision: The writ petition is disposed of with a direction for timely consideration of the petitioner's request.

ORDER

This petition is filed to seeking a direction directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated

28.03.2024 and pass orders.

2. Mr.P.Gurunathan, Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the first and second Respondents. Mr.P. Ananda Kumar, Government Advocate takes notice for the third respondent. In view of the consent expressed by the learned counsel appearing for either side, this petition is taken up for final disposal. .

3. Since no adverse orders has been passed against the fourth and fifth respondents notice to fourth and fifth respondents respondent dispensed with.

4.The facts of the case is that the petitioner has settled his property to his two sons who are the fourth and fifth respondents herein vide Document bearing Nos.4193 of 2012 dated 27.07.2012. After obtaining the properties the petitioner was not taken care by their sons and they are suffering from age-related ailments. Due to which the petitioners made a complaint before the first respondent under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 to cancel the settlement deed executed by the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that the no orders has been passed in his application till date. Hence, this petition.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a senior citizen and he has been made to run from pillar to post to establish his case. He further submitted that the petitioner is suffering due to the age-related ailments. While so, the fourth and fifth respondents herein who are the sons of the petitioner are not taking care of the petitioner. Hence, prays to allow this petition.

6. The learned Government Pleader and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondents submitted that they will prioritize the case of the petitioner as the petitioner is a senior citizen and take action in the manner known to law as early as possible.

7. For the foregoing reasons, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case directs the second respondent to consider the petitioner's application dated 28.03.2024 and conduct an enquiry within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after issuing notice to the 4th and 5th respondents. The second respondent is further directed to dispose of the case within a period of eight weeks from the date of conducting the enquiry.

8. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

19.07.2024 Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Index : Yes/No smn To

1. The District Social Welfare Officer Office of District Collectorate Tiruvallur District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divisional Office, Ambattur Division, 5-73, SH 112 Gandhi Nagar, Anna Nagar West Extension, Chennai – 600 040

3. The Sub Registrar Virugambakkam, Chennai – 600 083.

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.

smn

19.07.2024

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top