HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI
L.N.IYYAPANE – Appellant
Versus
MURUGANANTHAM – Respondent
ORDER
The petitioner is the accused in S.T.C.No.446 of 2021 and he preferred this Criminal Original Petition seeking to quash the case in S.T.C. No.446 of 2021 on the file of learned Addl. District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karaikal.
2. Heard both sides.
3. The case of the respondent is that for an urgent need, the petitioner had borrowed a sum of Rs.2,99,000/- on 23.04.2020 on the strength of a promissory note, thereby he has issued a cheque bearing No.128756 dated 03.06.2021 drawn on Andhra Bank, Karaikal towards discharge of the said liability. When the cheque was presented on instructions of petitioner on 25.06.2021 at the respondent's bank, it was returned as “Account closed”. Thereafter, the respondent issued a demand notice dated 03.07.2021 to him and the petitioner had replied to the said notice. Accordingly, he preferred a complaint under Sec.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act against the petitioner.
4. The learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the alleged cheque in question was not issued by him nor he is having any legal liability to the respondent herein. Moreover, the cheque under possession was not issued in the individual name of petitioner, on the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.