MADRAS HIGH COURT
M/s.Supreme Auto Comp India Private Ltd., – Appellant
Versus
M/s.Sri Agarwal Ispat (Chennai) Private Ltd., – Respondent
A.No.2839 of 2022
A.No.2839
of 2022
in
C.S.No.77 of 2022
C.SARAVANAN, J.
This application has been filed by the defendant to reject the plaint
filed in the above suit under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC. It is the specific
case of the applicant/defendant that the suit has been over valued to contrive
the jurisdiction of this Court and therefore the suit is also barred under law
and therefore the plaint is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of
CPC. Specifically, a reference is made to Section 12 (1)(a) of the
Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and the requirements contemplated in Order
VII Rule 2A of CPC has amended for the purpose of Commercial Courts
Act, 2015.
2.It is submitted that the plaint is silent regarding the calculation of
interest as required under Order VII Rule 2A of CPC has amended for the
purpose of Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
3.The learned counsel for the applicant/defendant has relied upon the
decision of the Madhya Pradesh (Jabalpur Bench) in the case of Vinod
Kumar Tamrakar Vs. Mukesh Kumar Agrawal in W.P.No.16296 of
1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.No.2839 of 2022
2005, wherein, it has been held the objection of the de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.