MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.Gagan Bothra, – Appellant
Versus
Mrs.Sadhana Srinivasan, – Respondent
A.No.4596 of 2022 in C.S.No.132 of 2010
A.No.4596 of 2022
in C.S.No.132 of 2010
Reserved on : 23.02.2023
Pronounced on : 03.03.2023
N.SESHASAYEE.J.,
1.1 This application is taken out by the sixth defendant in C.S.No.132 of 2010
under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, seeking rejection of the plaint. The facts leading
to this case may be briefly stated :
● A certain piece of immovable property belonged to M/s.Hymavathi
Constructions. It was an unregistered partnership firm. On
01.02.1996, it entered into a sale agreement with Mukanchand Bothra,
the first defendant in the suit (today on his demise, his heirs have
replaced him).
● To enforce the said agreement, the first defendant had laid
C.S.No.205 of 1999 against M/s.Hymavathi Constructions, and had
obtained an exparte decree on 02.09.2002.
● Few years later, the plaintiff ( M/s.Hymavathi Constructions) took out
an application to set aside the exparte decree along with an
1/12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.No.4596 of 2022 in C.S.No.132 of 2010
application in A.No.5021 of 2007 for condoning the delay of 1,765
days in filing the earlier mentioned application. On 26.02.2008, this
application i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.