2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 37128
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
GANDHI – Appellant
Versus
GAKARLA USHA IAS – Respondent
CONT P(MD) 171 2022
Cont.P(MD)No.171 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 23.02.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
Cont.P(MD)No.171 of 2022
in
W.A(MD)No.1163 of 2018
and
Sub.A(MD)No.56 of 2023
1.Gandhi
..1st Petitioner/
1stRespondent
2.K.Rethinam
3.M.Muthuvelli
4.U.Vellore
..Petitioners 2 to 4/
Respondents 3 to 5
5.S.Balagurusamy
6.S.Palusamy
.. Petitioners 5 & 6/
Respondents 7 & 8
[cause title accepted vide
order dt.20.01.2022 in
Sub.A(MD)334/2021]
Vs.
1. Gakarla Usha,I.A.S,
The State of Tamilnadu,
Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government,
School Education Department,
St.Fort George,
Chennai 09.
2 Dr.A.Karuppasamy,
__________
Page 1 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P(MD)No.171 of 2022
The Director of Eleemtnary Education,
DPI Campus, College Road,
Chennai 6.
3 Balaji,
The District Elementary Educational Officer,
Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram,
Now redesignated as the District Educational Officer,
Ramanathapuram District,
Ramanathapuram.
4 Usha Shanthi Joy,
The District Elementary Educational Officer,
Tuticorin District, Tuticorin,
Now redesignated as
The District Educational Officer,
Tuticorin District,
Camp at Pudukottai,
Tuticorin.
5 Murugammal,
The District Elementary Educational Officer,
Ramanathapuram District,
Ramanathapuram.
Now redesignated as
The District Educational Officer,
Mandapam,
Ramanathapuram District.
6 Krishnamoorthy,
The District Elementary Educational Officer,
Ramanathapuram District,
Ramanathapuram,
Now redesignated as
The District Educational Officer,
Paramakudi,
Ramanathapuram District.
.. Respondents/
Contemnors
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to initiate contempt
__________
Page 2 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P(MD)No.171 of 2022
proceedings against the contemnors for wilful disobedience
of the order of this Court passed in W.A(MD)No.1163 of 2018
dated 26.02.2021.
For Petitioners : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan
For Respondents
: Mr.D.Sasikumar
Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
and
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
After filing this contempt petition the District
Education Officer(Elementary Education), Paramakudi, has
passed proceedings dated 04.01.2023 complying the order of
this Court passed in W.A(MD)No.1163 of 2018 dated
26.02.2021 and time was granted to the learned counsel
appearing for the contempt petitioners to verify whether
the entire amount been sanctioned and paid in the said
proceedings.
2.Today, the learned counsel for the contemt
petitioners seeks time since he is not able to get
__________
Page 3 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P(MD)No.171 of 2022
instruction from his client.
3. This Court is of the view that since the order
dated 04.01.2023 has been passed with all the necessary
calculation, there is no necessity to keep this contempt
petition any further. Recording the proceedings of the
District Education Officer, Paramakudi, dated 04.01.2023
this contempt petition is closed. Consequently, connected
sub application is closed. If the contempt petitioners are
aggrieved by any error in the calculation, it is always
open to them to make representation to the authorities and
if any such representation is made, same shall be
considered and speaking order should be passed within a
period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the
representation.
[G.J.,J.] & [K.K.R.K.,J.]
23.02.2023
Internet:Yes
Index:Yes/No
NCC:Yes/No
PJL
__________
Page 4 of 6
https://www.mhc.