SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 37965

C.M.A.No.1247 of 2023

THE HIGH COURT OF JUD ICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.11.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

AND

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

C.M.A.No.1247 of 2023

and

C.M.P.No.12190 of 2023

P.Santhosh

...Appellant

Vs.

S.Mega

...Respondent

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family

Courts Act, 1984, r/w. Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, against

the order passed by the learned Family Court at Thiruvallur in I.A.No.4 of

2023 in HMOP.No.285 of 2022 dated 07.03.2023.

For Appellant

: Mr.M.Rajasekar

For Respondent

: No appearance

(Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against an order

granting a sum of Rs.7,500/- as interim maintenance for the wife. The

Original Petition was filed for divorce by the wife seeking judicial seperation

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Pending the same, the wife

filed an application in I.A.No.4 of 2023 seeking interim maintenance.

2.The said application was resisted by the husband contending

that she is an Engineering graduate and capable of maintaining herself. The

learned Family Judge found that the wife being an unemployed is entitled to

maintenance. The Family Court therefore, fixed the quantum of

maintenance at Rs.7,500/- per month, since the husband has a carry home

salary of Rs.35,052/- per month. Aggrieved by the said grant, the husband

is on appeal.

3.We have heard Mr.M.Rajasekar, learned counsel for the

appellant.

4.While reiterating the submissions made before the Family Court

regarding the ability of the wife to get an employment and sustain herself out

of the earnings, the learned counsel would also submit that the wife has not

filed an affidavit of assets. The non-filing of affidavit of assets cannot be a

ground to reject maintenance. We do not see any reason to interfere with the

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

order of the Trial Court. This Civil Miscelaneous Appeal therefore, fails and

it is accordingly, dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petition is closed.

(R.S.M., J.) (N.S., J.)

27.11.2023

kkn

Internet:Yes

Index:No

Speaking

Nuetral Citation :No

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

KKN

To:-

The Family Court,

Tiruvallur.

27.11.2023

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top