SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 39239

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
SURIN VIJAY, – Appellant
Versus
SHEJA, W/O. SURIN VIJAY, – Respondent
CMA(MD) 1288 2014



C.M.A(MD)No.1288 of 2014

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 19.06.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

C.M.A(MD)No.1288 of 2014

Surin Vijay

... Appellant/Petitioner

Vs.

Sheja

... Respondent/ Respondent

PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 55 of the

Divorce Act, to set aside the decree and judgment passed in I.D.O.P.No.

329 of 2011, dated 17.11.2014 on the file of Principal District Judge,

Kanyakumari at Nagercoil.

For Appellant

: Mr.A.Arumugam

For Respondent

: M/s.T.Jeen Joseph

JUDGMENT

The appellant had filed I.D.O.P.No.329 of 2011 before Principal

District Court, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil for the relief of divorce. The

said petition was dismissed by the trial Court. Challenging the same, the

present appeal has been filed.

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A(MD)No.1288 of 2014

2. Pending appeal, the parties have entered into a settlement out of

Court. The appellant/husband has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.23,00,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Three Lakh only) to the respondent/wife towards future

maintenance. The said amount has also been paid in two installments. On

receipt of the said maintenance amount, the wife has agreed to grant

divorce in favour of the husband by allowing the appeal.

3. The parties have filed a Joint Compromise Memo, dated

19.06.2023. Both the parties and their respective counsels have signed in

the said memo. Both the parties were present and this Court has enquired

them about the contents of the compromise memo and they have agreed

that they have settled the matter and a decree for divorce may be granted.

4. In view of the above said facts, the marriage between the

appellant and the respondent held on 03.05.2006 is dissolved. The

respondent/wife had received a sum of Rs.23,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty

Three Lakh only) towards full maintenance amount and she has no

further claim as against the husband. The compromise memo shall form

part of the decree.

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A(MD)No.1288 of 2014

5. With the above said observations, this Civil Miscellaneous

Appeal stands allowed. No costs.

19.06.2023

gbg

NCC : Yes / No

Index

: Yes / No

Internet : Yes / No

To

1.The Principal District Judge,

Kanyakumari,

Nagercoil.

2.The Section Officer,

Vernacular Section,

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai.

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A(MD)No.1288 of 2014

R.

VIJAYAKUMAR

,J.

gbg

Judgment made in

C.M.A(MD)No.1288 of 2014

19.06.2023

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top