2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 39872
MADRAS HIGH COURT
SMT.MANONMANI, – Appellant
Versus
Manimegalai and 2 others – Respondent
A 5352 2023
A.NO.5352 OF 2023
IN C.S.NO.156 OF 2022
A.NO.5352 OF 2023
IN
C.S.NO.156 OF 2022
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
This application has been filed by the applicant / sole defendant
to implead the proposed parties as defendants 2 and 3.
2.The Suit has been originally filed by the plaintiff against only
one defendant seeking partition of the properties. Now that this application
has been filed by the sole defendant in the Suit as if in the “C” Schedule
property, her eldest son is in possession and “D” Schedule property is also
looked after by him and there was an oral settlement in his favour and
therefore, they are all necessary parties to the Suit.
3.I have perused the entire affidavit and the Suit has been laid
for the properties left by the parents and sister of the plaintiff and
defendant. In the absence of any title, right or interest over the properties
created by any of the document, mere oral submission of the
defendant/applicant to implead her children will not arise at all. After all,
1/3
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.NO.5352 OF 2023
IN C.S.NO.156 OF 2022
the Suit is one for partition between the sisters and their rights has to be
established in pleadings and evidence. Whatever rights derived by the
defendant / applicant, then only the same will enure the benefit of the
proposed parties.
4.In such view of the matter, the plaintiff being dominis litis and
the proposed parties have no interest or whatsoever in the Suit property,
they cannot be impleaded as parties to the Suit as a matter of right.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
5.Post the Suit before the Additional Master – III for
continuation of evidence on 27.11.2023.
01.11.2023
TK
2/3
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.NO.5352 OF 2023
IN C.S.NO.156 OF 2022
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
TK
A.NO.5352 OF 2023
IN C.S.NO.156 OF 2022
01.11.2023
3/3
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis