MADRAS HIGH COURT
SARANRAJ – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
Crl.O.P.No.31287 of 2022
Crl.O.P.No.31287 of 2022
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under
Sections 457, 380(2) of IPC in Cr.No.121 of 2021 on the file of the
respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that petitioner is that on 06.04.2021,
the petitioner had trespassed into the temple and committed theft of idols
worth about Rs.50,000/-. Hence, the case.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that
the petitioner has not been committed any offence as alleged by the
prosecution. Since he happens to be the friend of main accused. He further
submitted that this is the second anticipatory bail petition. Therefore, he
prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.31287 of 2022
the petitioner had trespassed into the temple and committed theft of idols
worth about Rs.50,000/-. He would further submitted that one previous
case as against the petitioner and stolen idol has been recovered. Therefore,
he vehemently opposed to gra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.