SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 36013

MADRAS HIGH COURT
SARANRAJ – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent


Crl.O.P.No.31287 of 2022

Crl.O.P.No.31287 of 2022

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under

Sections 457, 380(2) of IPC in Cr.No.121 of 2021 on the file of the

respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that petitioner is that on 06.04.2021,

the petitioner had trespassed into the temple and committed theft of idols

worth about Rs.50,000/-. Hence, the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that

the petitioner has not been committed any offence as alleged by the

prosecution. Since he happens to be the friend of main accused. He further

submitted that this is the second anticipatory bail petition. Therefore, he

prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the

1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.31287 of 2022

the petitioner had trespassed into the temple and committed theft of idols

worth about Rs.50,000/-. He would further submitted that one previous

case as against the petitioner and stolen idol has been recovered. Therefore,

he vehemently opposed to gra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top