SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 14225

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
MANOHARAN – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent


O R D E R

Heard Mr. M.Subash, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. V.Ravi, Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the First Respondent and Mr. Raja Mathivanan, Learned Counsel for the Second Respondent and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.

2. Having regard to the nature of order proposed to be passed in the Writ Petition, which would not cause any prejudice to the Third Respondent, notice to it is dispensed with.

3. The grievance ventilated by the Petitioner is that he had made a representation dated 23.01.2024 to the Second Respondent to restrain the Third Respondent from collecting excessive rent or to distract him from carrying on business of selling vegetables in the shop at Namakkal Daily Market, but as it did not evoke any response, it has necessitated the filing of this Writ Petition.

4. Having regard to the limited nature of relief sought, this Court without expressing any view on the merits of the controversy involved, passes the following order:-

(i) the Second Respondent shall immediately examine the representation dated 23.01.2024 made by the Petitioner including ascertaining as to whether the Petitioner would be en

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top