SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 14218

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
N.VENKAIYAN – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION – Respondent


O R D E R

Heard Mr. G.Adithyaraj, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. V.Ravi, Learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the First and Second Respondents, Mr. Shanmugavalli Sekar, Learned Counsel, who takes notice for the Third Respondent and Mr. L.P.Maurya, Learned Counsel, who takes notice for the Fourth Respondent and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.

2. The grievance ventilated by the Petitioner is that he had made a representation dated 03.08.2022 to remove the garbage dumped alongside the river bank of Cheyyar River in Tiruvannamalai District as recommended by the Third Respondent in his Letter No. Ko.Complaint-04(27)/Ma.Su.Soo.Po/ Tha.Na.Maa.Ka.Vaa/Tiruvannamalai/2022 dated 08.09.2022, but as it did not evoke any response, it has necessitated the filing of this Writ Petition.

3. Having regard to the limited nature of relief sought, this Court without expressing any view on the merits of the controversy involved, passes the following order:-

(i) the Fourth Respondent shall immediately examine the representation dated 03.08.2022 made by the Petitioner including ascertaining as to whether the Petitioner would be entit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top