SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 21888

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Kalyanasundar .T.S – Appellant
Versus
Director of School Education – Respondent



An appeal against an administrative decision must be explicitly provided by law; absence of such provision means no right to appeal exists.

Headnote:

Regulation - Education - Tamil Nadu Schools (Regulation of Collection of Fee) Act, 2009 - Sections 11, 13; Tamil Nadu Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 2018 - Section 41 - The court held that the petitioner had no statutory right to appeal against the district committee's decision as the relevant acts did not confer such a right.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the district committee's clean chit to a school management regarding excess fee collection. He argued for appeal rights based on related statutes.

Issues: Whether the petitioner has a statutory right to appeal against the decision of the district committee under the relevant education acts.

Ratio Decidendi: Right to appeal must be explicitly provided by statute; the petitioner lacked the right to appeal as neither relevant act conferred it.

Final Decision: The writ petition is dismissed.

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2.The petitioner lodged a complaint that the management of the fourth respondent school has been indulging in excess collection of fees. He filed W.P.(MD)No.1564 of 2020 and a direction was given to the district committee on 10.04.2023. The petitioner also filed Cont.P.(MD)No.2040 of 2023 in this regard. Finally, the district committee went into the issue and gave clean chit to the management vide proceedings dated 07.03.2024. Challenging the same, the petitioner filed a representation dated 13.05.2024 before the Director of School Education. Seeking disposal of the same, this writ petition has been filed. 3.The stand of the petitioner is that he has filed an appeal and he is entitled to seek its disposal.

4.The learned counsel for the fourth respondent submitted that the petitioner has no statutory right to file any appeal before the first respondent. According to the school management, this writ petition itself is not maintainable. The learned Additional Government Pleader for the official respondents endorsed the stand taken by the fourth respondent. The respondents pray for dismissal of the writ petition.

5.I carefully considered the rival contentions and went through the materials on record. The Tamil Nadu Schools (Regulation of Collection of Fee) Act, 2009 provides for regulation of collection of fees by schools in the State of Tamil Nadu. It provides for constitution of fee determination committee and also district committees constituted under Section 11 of the Act. of the , 2009 is as follows:-

11.District Committee (1) There shall be a District Committee in every revenue district, which shall consist of the Chief Educational Officer of the district as Chairperson and such other members as may be prescribed.

(2) The District Committee or any member of the said committee authorised by it in this behalf may, at any time, during the normal working hours of any private school, enter such private school or any premises thereof or any premises belonging to the management of such private school if it or he has reason to believe that there is or has been any contravention of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder and search and inspect any record, accounts, register or other document belonging to such private school or of the management, in so far as any such record, accounts, register or other document relates to such private school and seize any such record, accounts, register or other document for the purpose of ascertaining whether there is or has been any such contravention.

(3) The provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 relating to search and seizure shall apply, so far as may be, to search and seizure under sub-section (2).”

6.The said statute contains 16 sections in all. As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the fourth respondent, there is no appeal provision incorporated in the said statute. It is well settled that there is no inherent right to file an appeal. Right of appeal is a statutory right. It has to be specifically conferred by law. If law does not provide for an appeal, a person aggrieved by an administrative decision will have to necessarily go before the jurisdictional Court.

7.The learned counsel for the petitioner endeavoured to overcome this impediment by pointing out that under Section 13 of the Tamil Nadu Schools (Regulation of Collection of Fee) Act, 2009, the provisions of the Act are in addition to, and not in derogation of, any other law for the time being in force. He contended that since Section 41 of the Tamil Nadu Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 2018 which should be read along with , 2009 provides for an appeal remedy, the petitioner was entitled to move the first respondent.

8. Section 41 of the Tamil Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 2018 is as follows:-

“41.Appeal against orders of Competent Authority Any person aggrieved by any order, decision or direction of the competent authority made under any of the provisions of this Act, o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top