SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 13775

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice V. SIVAGNANAM
P.NACHIMUTHU – Appellant
Versus
VENUGOPAL – Respondent



A dismissal order by one judge cannot be improperly reviewed by another, highlighting the need for adherence to procedural requirements in civil litigation.

Headnote:

CPC - Civil Revision - CPC Section 152 - The court upheld the trial court's decision that the application for restoration was not maintainable as it sought to review a dismissal order from another judge, reinforcing the principle of maintaining the integrity of prior judgments.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to restore a suit dismissed for default due to non-filing of an amended plaint. The trial court returned the restoration application as not maintainable under CPC, Section 152, citing that it could not review the dismissal order by a different judge.

Finding of the Court:

The court analyzed the circumstances leading to the original dismissal and confirmed that the trial court's order returning the restoration application was consistent with procedural rules, thus finding no errors in the trial court's reasoning.

Issues: Whether the trial court erred in holding that the restoration application was not maintainable under Section 152 of CPC due to dismissal by a different judge.

Ratio Decidendi: The principle established is that a dismissal order by one judge cannot be reviewed or restored by another judge in the same manner, emphasizing the importance of judicial consistency and adherence to procedural norms.

Final Decision: The civil revision petition is dismissed with liberty to file a restoration application.

O R D E R

The civil revision petition is filed to set aside the docket order dated

28.07.2023, in unnumbered I.A.No... of 2022 in OS No.1533 of 2008 on the file of IV Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.

2. The petitioner has filed OS No.1533 of 2008 on the file of IV Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore seeking declaration and the same was dismissed for default on 24.06.2022. Thereafter, the petitioner has filed an application in unnumbered I.A.No... of 2022 in OS No.1533 of 2008 to restore the suit on file. The trial court, by docket order dated 28.07.2023, returned it as not maintainable. Hence, the civil revision petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the leaned judge without considering the facts properly, has passed the impugned order.

Hence, seeking to allow the Revision.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.

5. The impugned order dated 28.07.2023 reads as under:

Since, the dismissal order has been passed by the predecessor (FACT) Judge, the order cannot be reviewed u/s 152 CPC. Hence, this petition is not maintainable. Hence, returned.

6. The order passed in OS No.1533 of 2008, dated 24.06.2022 by the learned IV Additional District Munsif reads as under:

APC not filed. This case is pending for APC from 19.09.2018 to till date. The plaintiff has not come forward to file the APC. Hence, sufficient time is granted for the plaintiff beyond the prescribed period of 14 days. Hence, the case is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

7. Since the petitioner/plaintiff has not filed amended plaint copy from 19.09.2018 till the date of dismissal, i.e. on 24.06.2022, the suit was dismissed for default. Under these circumstances, the instant application was filed to restore the suit, which was returned as not maintainable. The petition was filed under Section 152 CPC to recall the order, hence the learned judge returned the application. Therefore, I find no infirmity in the order passed by the trial court. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file restoration application. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, CMP No.3539 of 2024 is closed.

07.03.2024 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No mrn To The IV Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.

V .SIVAGNANAM, J.

(mrn)

07.03.2024

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top