SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 11558

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs Justice R. HEMALATHA
DAMODAR HARIRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP BY – Respondent


ORDER

The revision petitioners are the accused 1 to 4 in CCB Crime No.258/2022 of Central Crime Branch, Chit & Kanthuvatti Wing, Team VII, Egmore, Chennai.

2. Arumugam, the 2nd respondent (defacto complainant)

lodged a complaint with the Inspector of Police Central Crime Branch, Chit & Kanthuvatti Wing, Team VII, Egmore, Chennai stating that the present petitioners are charging exorbitant rate of interest for the loan of Rs.1,70,00,000/- borrowed by him.

3. The case of the defacto complainant in nutshell is as follows:

(1)The defacto complainant is running a construction business in the name and style of M/s. Rajkham Housing and M/s.Rajkham Builders Private Limited and he is the Managing Director of the both the companies.

(2)Since the defacto complainant was in need of money, he borrowed a sum of Rs.1,70,00,000/- from the revision petitioners and also created a simple mortgage by deposit of title deed dated 20.01.2022 and the same was registered as document No.230/2022 dated 21.01.2022 on the file of the Sub Registrar Office, Kodambakkam.

(3)When the defacto complainant approached the revision petitioners/accused to redeem the mortgaged properties, they demanded a sum of Rs.40 lakhs towa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top