IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA Crl.R.C.No. 899 of 2023 &
Crl.M.P. Nos. 7313 & 11521 of 2023
1. Damodar Hariram
2. Amit Damodar
3. Vinay R. Asrani
4. Ramesh L Asrani ...Petitioners Vs.
1. The State Represented by The Inspector of Police CCB-I, Chennai.
2. Arumugam ...Respondents Prayer : Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 20.04.2023 passed in Crl.M.P. No.3557/2023 on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate, for Exclusive Trial of CCB cases (relating to Cheating Cases in Chennai) and CBCID Metro Cases, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.
For Petitioners : Mr.P.V.Balasubramanian, Senior Counsel Assisted by M/s. S. Ganesh & Ganesh, Mr. K. Jayaraman For R1 : Mr.R. Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
For R2 : Mr. R. Vivekananthan
ORDER
The revision petitioners are the accused 1 to 4 in CCB Crime No.258/2022 of Central Crime Branch, Chit & Kanthuvatti Wing, Team VII, Egmore, Chennai.
2. Arumugam, the 2nd respondent (defacto complainant)
lodged a complaint with the Inspector of Police Central Crime Branch, Chit & Kanthuvatti Wing, Team VII, Egmore, Chennai stating that the present petitioners are charging exorbitant rate of interest for the loan of Rs.1,70,00,000/- borrowed by him.
3. The case of the defacto complainant in nutshell is as follows:
(1)The defacto complainant is running a construction business in the name and style of M/s. Rajkham Housing and M/s.Rajkham Builders Private Limited and he is the Managing Director of the both the companies.
(2)Since the defacto complainant was in need of money, he borrowed a sum of Rs.1,70,00,000/- from the revision petitioners and also created a simple mortgage by deposit of title deed dated 20.01.2022 and the same was registered as document No.230/2022 dated 21.01.2022 on the file of the Sub Registrar Office, Kodambakkam.
(3)When the defacto complainant approached the revision petitioners/accused to redeem the mortgaged properties, they demanded a sum of Rs.40 lakhs towards interest and thus charged an exorbitant rate of interest.
(4)Based on these allegations, an FIR in Crime No.258/2022 was registered by the 1st respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 3 and 4 of the Exorbitant Interest Act, 2003 and 406 and 420 IPC against the present revision petitioners and the following documents were seized from them.
| S. No. | Doc. No. | Date of Document | Nature of the document | Executed by | In favour of |
| 1. | 5788/1981 | 30.09.1981 | Simple Mortgage deed | Noorjahan Bibi & another | The Nungambakkam Saswatha Dhana Rakshaka Nidhi Ltd. |
| 2. | 2035/1983 | 25.07.1983 | Simple Mortgage deed | Noorjahan Bibi & another | The Nungambakkam Saswatha Dhana Rakshaka Nidhi Ltd. |
| 3. | 2728/1985 | 30.08.1985 | First Simple Mortgage deed | Noorjahan Bibi & another | Parvathiraman |
| 4. | 243/1989 | 26.04.1989 | Power of Attorney | Mrs. M.Noorjahan Bibi | Mr. Haja Mohideen |
| 5. | 2465/1995 | 04.05.1995 Receipt | Parvathiraman | M.Noorjahan Bibi | |
| 6. | 2536/1995 | 08.05.1995 | Simple Mortgage deed | Noorjahan Bibi & another | Ineian Members Benefit Fund Ltd. |
| 7. | 1493/2002 | 19.04.2002 Receipt | Ineian Members Benefit Fund Ltd. | Noorjahan Bibi & another | |
| 8. | 1733/2002 | 09.05.2002 | Sale deed | Noorjahan Bibi & another | Mrs. Nirubarani |
| 9. | 1734/2002 | 09.05.2002 | Sale deed | Noorjahan Bibi & another | Mr.T.Muthu Vijayan |
| 10. | CA No.1084 / 80-81 | 06.07.1981 Extract | from permanent Land Register | Tahsildar Egmore- - Nungambakkam Taluk | Noorjahan |
| 11. | CA No. 242/02-03 | 20.02.2023 Extract | from Town survey Land Register | Tahsildar Egmore- - Nungambakkam Taluk | Nirubarani & T.Muthu Vijayan |
| 12. | 230/2022 | 21.01.2022 Agreement | relating to deposit of title deeds. | Muthu Vijayan & Niruba Rani | Vinay Asrani |
(5)Thereafter the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant filed a petition under Section 451 r/w 457 Cr.P.C in Crl.M.P. No.3557/2023 before the trial court seeking return of documents seized from the revision petitioners/accused by the police. The said petition was partly allowed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Exclusive Trial of CCB cases (relating to Cheating Cases in Chennai) and CBCID Metro Cases, Egmore, Chennai 600 008, vide her orders dated 20.04.2023, by returning the documents 1 to11 on the following conditions:
"(1) The petitioner is hereby directed to the produce the certified copy of the said documents before this court.
(2) The petitioners shall produce the said documents before this Court as and when required."
As far as document No.12 is concerned, it was dismissed by the trial court on the ground that it is only a photostat copy .
4. Aggrie
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.