SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 27764

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASA D, J
P.Sasikumar – Appellant
Versus
The Director – Respondent
W.P.No.7822 of 2019 and W.M.P.No.8460 of 2019



Advocates:
Mr.V.Prakash Senior Counsel Assisted by Mr.N.Palanikumar; Mr.J.Ravindran Additional Advocate General Assisted by M/s.R.L.Karthika Government Advocate

The court held that revisional powers cannot be exercised when an appeal is available, affirming the finality of the order granting Ryotwari Patta.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Inam Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1963 - Sections 5(2), 11(1)(i), and 12(2) - Writ petition challenging the suo moto revisional proceedings initiated by the first respondent against the order of the Assistant Settlement Officer - The court held that the order dated 28.02.2012 is appealable and the first respondent lacked jurisdiction to initiate revisional proceedings under Section 5(2) as an appeal remedy was available. (Paras 2, 6, 46, 49)

(B) Jurisdiction - The court emphasized that the revisional powers cannot be exercised when an appeal is available, reinforcing the principle that statutory provisions must be adhered to strictly. (Paras 48, 49)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners sought to quash the Show Cause Notice issued by the first respondent regarding the cancellation of the Ryotwari Patta granted to them by the Assistant Settlement Officer on 28.02.2012, arguing that the order had attained finality as no appeal was filed.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the impugned proceedings were initiated without jurisdiction and quashed the Show Cause Notice.

Issues: The main issue was whether the first respondent had the power to suo moto review an appealable order.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the first respondent could not exercise revisional powers under Section 5(2) when an appeal was available under Section 12(2), thus affirming the finality of the order dated 28.02.2012.

Result: Writ Petition allowed.

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a certiorari, to call for the records of the impugned suo-moto revisional proceedings of the first respondent herein under Section 5(2) of the Tamil Nadu Inam Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1963 (Act 23/1963) emanating for the issuance of impugned Show Cause Notice dated 20.11.2018 in his proceedings in E2/1734/2018(2) culminating into consecutive Notice in E2/1734/2018(2) dated 31.01.2019 and quash the same.

2. The case of the petitioners is that originally M.Ekambaram and others filed a Claim Application/Petition before the first respondent herein seeking issuance of Ryotwari Patta with respect to their respective lands situated at Echankarai Village, Chengalpet Taluk, Kanchipuram District. The said village was an Inam Estate. The Petitioners herein claimed issuance of Patta for their respective lands situate in the above mentioned Echankarai Village under Section 11(1)(i) of the Tamil Nadu Inam Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1963 (Act 23/1963) on the strength of personal cultivation of the lands for more than the period prescribed under the said Act. The second respondent herein, vide his order dated 28.02.2012 in his proceedings in S.R.01/2011-1/E2 directed that Ryotwari Patta shall be issued to the claimants. However, it is pertinent to mention that the final orders were passed issuing Ryotwari Patta for the lands in the name of its respective claimants. It is also mentioned in the order dated 28.02.2012, it has been clearly provided that any party aggrieved by the said order shall prefer an Appeal before the Tribunal with a span of three months from the date of order under Section 12(2) of the said Act. In so far the Government is concerned, limitation to prefer appeal has been provided as one year. Admittedly, no appeal has been preferred either by any aggrieved party or by the Government till date and therefore the order of the second respondent herein dated 28.02.2012 in his proceedings in S.R.01/2011-1/E2 had attained finality. Following the orders of the second respondent, the third respondent had issued Patta to the claimants vide his order dated 09.05.2012 and effected necessary mutations in the revenue records. Section 5(2) of the said Act empowers the first respondent to revise or cancel those non-appealable orders of Settlement Officer. The said provision, in its crystal clear terms, prohibits the exercise of such revisional powers by the first respondent herein with respect to orders of Settlement officer, for which appeal remedy is available before the Tribunal. In the present case, the order dated 28.02.2012 made by the second respondent herein in his proceedings in S.R.01/2011-1/E2 is appealable to the Tribunal as provided under Section 12(2) of the said Act. Thus, the above suo moto proceedings initiated by the first respondent herein suffers from lack of jurisdiction and explicit statutory prohibition. Hence the writ petition.

3. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 20.11.2018 issued by the first respondent herein calling upon the petitioners herein to show cause in suo moto proceedings initiated by them under Section 5(2) of the Act Tamil Nadu Inam Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1963 (Act 23 of 1963) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) as to why the order dated 28.02.2012 made by the second respondent herein in his proceedings in S.R.01/2011-1/E2 shall not be declared as cancelled. The above Show Cause Notice culminates into consecutive notice issued by the first respondent herein in his proceedings in E2/1734/2018(2) dated 31.01.2019. He further submitted that originally M.Ekambaram and others filed a claim application before the first respondent herein seeking issuance of Ryotwari Patta with respect to their respective lands situated at Echankarai Village, Chenga

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top