SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 38039

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
S KARUNANIDHI – Appellant
Versus
V. NATARAJAN – Respondent


ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition had been filed seeking to set aside the fair and final order of the learned Sub Judge (Rent Control Appellate Authority), Tiruvarur, dated 10.03.2020 made in R.C.A.No.1 of 2018 confirming the fair and final order of the learned District Munsif (Rent Controller), Tiruvarur dated 20.11.2017 made in R.C.O.P.No.3 of 2014 and allow the above revision.

2.The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner was not a tenant in the premises for which R.C.O.P.No.3 of 2014 was filed by the Respondent claiming the property through the Will executed by land lady, as he was a permissive occupier. The Respondent had instituted the Petition for eviction on the ground of demolition and construction. He claimed that he had put on notice to the Petitioner herein, who is Respondent in R.C.O.P. as tenant, objected his tenancy. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that in the R.C.O.P.No.3 of 2014, the Petitioner filed a counter denying the status that he was not a tenant and he was permissive occupier. Therefore, the Rent Control Original Petition is not at all maintainable. In spite of the same, learned District Munsif (Rent Controller) Tir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top