HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
PUNITHA KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
K.R.ASHAMANI – Respondent
O R D E R
This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated
10.08.2021 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Tiruppur in I.A.No.318 of 2020 in O.S.No.262 of 2019.
2. The first respondent / plaintiff has filed O.S.No.262 of
2019 against the petitioner and 3 others, seeking partition of the suit property into 3 equal shares based on the Will dated 19.01.1980 and one share to the plaintiff; to grant permanent injunction, restraining the petitioner from permanently alienating or encumbering the suit property. After entering appearance, the petitioner, who is the 4th defendant in the suit filed I.A.No.318 of 2020 under Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C. for rejection of plaint.
3. The case of the petitioner in brief, as seen from the affidavit filed in support of this petition, is that, the suit was filed by the first respondent, claiming partition of the suit property on the basis of the Will dated 19.01.1980. The first respondent claims that the suit property belongs to the father of Ramasamy, who purchased it on 24.08.1960. It is also alleged that his brother-in-law Palanisamy, who is the father of the petitioner fraudulently claim right in the suit property on the basis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.