HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice R. PONGIAPPAN
KAMAKSHI D/O. CHINNAN KOTHAN – Appellant
Versus
SUBRAMANIAN S/O. RATHINA – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
This Second Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and Decree made in A.S.No.148 of 2006 dated 27.10.2009 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Vridhachalam thereby partly allowing the same insofar as the relief of permanent injunction is concerned and dismissed the relief of declaration of title modifying the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.1014 of 1992 dated 07.04.2005 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court at Vridhachalam.
2. The defendants 1, 3 and 4 in O.S.No.1014 of 1992 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Vridhachalam is the appellants herein. Before the said Court, the respondent herein filed the above referred suit as against the appellants and one another Valarmathi (Died) seeking the relief of declaration declaring that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the suit schedule property and for the relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants/appellants or his agents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. Alternatively, he prayed for the relief of possession in case of forcible possession and for compensation towards the rent from the date of plaint till the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.