SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 5682

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR
M.RAHMATHULLAH – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent


JUDGMENT

*************

The appellants/A1 and A2 were charged for the offences under Sections 302 r/w 34 and 506(ii) IPC. The trial Court, by its judgment dated 25.02.2014, though found the appellants not guilty for the offences under Sections 302 r/w 34 and 506(ii) IPC, found the appellants guilty for the offence under 304(1) I.P.C. and sentenced them to undergo 10 years RI each and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each in default to undergo 6 month SI each. Against the said conviction and sentence, this present appeal has been filed.

2.It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants that during pendency of the appeal, A2 in this case passed away on 10.02.2015. This fact was not denied by the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) also. In view of the same, this appeal abates in respect of A2.

3.The case of the prosecution briefly stated as follows:

(i)The deceased Kalifullah is the brother of P.W.1 Mohammed Meeran. P.W.5 Rajitha Begam is the wife of the deceased Kalifullah. Four months prior to the occurrence, the deceased came to the house of P.W.1 at Kuthbisha Nagar, Trichy for doing painting works. P.W.2 Kalifulla is the brother-in-law of P.W.1 and he is also

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top