MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice G.ILANGOVAN
2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Ninth day
(MD) No.13903
POCSO ACT - SENTENCE SUSPENSION - [The court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner seeking suspension of sentence and release on bail pending disposal of the main criminal appeal against the conviction and sentence imposed on him for offences under the POCSO Act. The court held that the petitioner was not entitled to suspension of sentence as he had taken advantage of the immaturity of the victim girl and committed the crime, and if released on bail, there was every likelihood of him causing trouble to the victim girl.]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was convicted and sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.5,000/- for offences under sections 5(1)(m) r/w 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and one year rigorous imprisonment for the offence under section 506(i) IPC. The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking suspension of sentence and release on bail pending disposal of the main criminal appeal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner had taken advantage of the immaturity of the victim girl and committed the crime. If released on bail, there was every likelihood of him causing trouble to the victim girl. Therefore, the petitioner was not entitled to suspension of sentence.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to suspension of sentence and release on bail pending disposal of the main criminal appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was not entitled to suspension of sentence as he had taken advantage of the immaturity of the victim girl and committed the crime, and if released on bail, there was every likelihood of him causing trouble to the victim girl.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner seeking suspension of sentence and release on bail pending disposal of the main criminal appeal.
CRL MP(MD) No.13903 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Ninth day of January Two Thousand and Twenty Three
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN
CRL MP(MD) No.13903 of 2022
IN
CRL A(MD) No.396 of 2021
MURUGAN
... APPELLANT/SOLE ACCUSED
Vs
State Rep.by
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,
DINDIGUL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
(IN CRIME NO.13 OF 2018)
... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein
and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to
suspend the sentence imposed against the petitioner and release him
on bail pending disposal of the main Criminal Appeal before this
Honble court against the Judgment of the Honble Sessions Judge, Fast
Track Mahila court, Dindigul in Special S.C.No.49 of 2018 dated
05.05.2021.
Prayer in CRL A(MD).396/2021 :
To call for the entire records connected with the judgment
rendered by the Hon'ble Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court,
Dindigul in Special S.C.No.49 of 2018 dated 05.05.2021 and set aside
the same and consequently acquit the appellant
Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon
perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the
arguments of M/S.PRAKASH R, Advocate for the petitioner and of
MR.B.NAMBI SELVAN, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the
Respondent, the court made the following order:-
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to suspend the
conviction and sentence imposed against the petitioner in Special SC
No.49 of 2018, dated 05/05/2021 by the Sessions Judge, Fast Track
Mahila Court, Dindigul and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending
disposal of the criminal appeal.
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL MP(MD) No.13903 of 2022
2.The case of the prosecution in brief:-
On 02/09/2018 at about 05.30 pm, when the victim girl went to
the groceries shop, while she was retuning to her house by crossing
the railway gate, the accused called her, forcibly pulled her into
his hut and committed penetrative sexual assault. She was also
threatened by him that if she discloses the occurrence to her
parents, he would kill her family members. Again, on 03/09/2018 at
about 05.30 pm, when the victim girl was returning to her house from
her school, the accused pulled her to his hut and committed
penetrative sexual assault. Based upon the occurrence, the case was
registered for the offence under section 5(1)(m) r/w section 6 of
POCSO Act,2012. After completing the formalities of investigation,
the respondent police filed charge sheet against the
petitioner/accused for the offences under sections 5(1)(m) r/w 6 of
POCSO Act.
3.At the time of trial process, on the side of the prosecution
to prove the guilt of the accused, 18 witnesses have been examined
and 11 documents marked. On the side of the accused, none was
examined and no document was also exhibited.
4.At the conclusion of the trial, the trial court found the
accused guilty, convicted and sentenced to undergo 10 years R/I and
imposed a fine of Rs.5,000/- with default clause for the offence
under section 5(1)(m) r/w section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 and for the
offence under section 506(i)IPC, sentenced him to undergo one year
R/I. The above said sentences are directed to run concurrently.
5.Challenging the above said sentence, criminal appeal has been
preferred before this court. Pending appeal, this criminal
miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner.
6.Heard both sides.
7.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit
that there was no injury on the private part of the victim; the date
of birth of the victim was not properly established and the dress
materials were not recovered and sent to the Forensic Science
Laboratory for chemical examination.
8.The next submission is th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.