SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 14450

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
SATHYANARAYANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP BY – Respondent


ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.3 of 2022 on the file of 1st respondent police.

2. Heard both sides.

3. The petitioners are ranked as accused 1 and 2 in the F.I.R. in Crime No.3 of 2022 registered for an offence under Sec.420, 409, 506(ii) of I.P.C. based on the complaint given by the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant.

4. Brief facts of the case is that the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant used to supply gold jewels to the petitioners on 90 days credit basis, for which the petitioners have to supply equal weight of the said jewels in 24 carat gold bars with their profit margin. Accordingly, in the first week of August 2007, the 1st petitioner ordered jewellery weighing about 23 kgms., which was supplied by the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant at his father-in-law's house in Tirppur on 19.08.2007 and the 1st petitioner assured to give gold bars weighing 23 kgs. within 3 months, but he failed to supply the gold bars. On many occasions, 2nd respondent/defacto complainant requested them to give gold bars, but they have not complied. On 16.11.2021 around 11.00 a.m. near RK Residency, Avinasi Road, Tiruppur, the 2nd respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top