C O M M O N J U D G M E N T

M.DURAISWAMY, J.

Since the facts relating to the filing of the Original Side Appeals are common, all the three appeals are disposed of by this common judgment.

2.The above Original Side Appeals have been filed by the appellant as against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 06.10.2021 made in O.A.Nos.554 to 556 of 2021 in C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.55 of 2021.

3.The respondent filed a suit in C.S. (Comm. Div.).No.55 of 2021 for the following reliefs:

(i)permanent injunction restraining the defendant, their management, members, affiliates, directors, servants, officers, employees, representatives, agents and all other persons claiming under them or acting in concert with them or on their behalf or acting on their instructions from telecasting, broadcasting, publishing, disseminating or otherwise communicating to the public in any manner, any advertisement or any part thereof in any language or any other representation or in any manner or part thereof in any language to be telecast or broadcast or communicated to the public or published in any manner which directly or indirectly or in any manner, disparages and/or denigrates the plaintiff's NIMYLE branded goods and/or category of goods to which it belongs;

(ii)permanent injunction restraining the defendant, their management, members, affiliates, directors, servants, officers, employees, representatives, agents and all other persons claiming under them or acting in concert with them or on their behalf or acting on their instructions from using in relation to the defendant's goods in any manner by way of advertisement or any manner whatsoever, the words “NIMYLE” or any other mark identical and/or deceptively similar thereto that infringes the plaintiff's registered trademark/label NIMYLE or from using any other depiction of the product NIMYLE or any trade dress or distinctive feature thereof;

(iii)an order directing the defendant to deliver up to the plaintiff for destruction, all master tapes, CDs, DVDs or any other copies/material containing the disparaging advertisements and for other reliefs.

4.In the said suit, the respondent filed an application in O.A.No.554 of 2021 to grant an interim injunction restraining the respondent from telecasting, broadcasting, publishing, disseminating or otherwise communicating to the public in any manner, any advertisement or any part thereof or any other advertisements of a similar nature in any language or any other representation or in any manner or part thereof or any other advertisement of a similar nature to be telecast or broadcast or communicated to the public or published in any manner which directly or indirectly or in any manner, disparages and/or denigrates the applicant's NIMYLE brand and/or goods bearing the NIMYLE trademark in any manner whatsoever, pending disposal of the suit.

4.1.The respondent filed an application in O.A.No.555 of 2021 to grant an interim injunction restraining the respondent from using in relation to the defendant's goods in any manner by way of advertisement or any manner whatsoever, the words “NIMYLE” or any other mark identical and/or deceptively similar thereto that infringes the plaintiff's registered trademark/label NIMYLE or from using any other depiction of the product NIMYLE or any trade dress or distinctive feature thereof in any manner whatsoever pending disposal of the suit.

4.2.In the said suit, the respondent also filed another application in O.A.No.556 of 2021 to grant an interim injunction restraining the respondent from telecasting, broadcasting, publishing, disseminating or otherwise communicating to the public in any manner the impugned advertisement with NIMYLE HERBAL Floor cleaner or the trade mark NIMYLE or any part thereof or any other advertisements of a similar nature in any language or any other representation or in any other manner or part thereof or any other advertisement of a similar nature disparaging and/or denigrated the plaintiff, its trademarks and/or prod