Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
R. Sakthivel, J
SUBRAMANIAM – Appellant
Versus
LAKSHMI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's suit dismissed (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. plaintiff's argument for advocate commissioner (Para 7) |
| 3. defendants' contention against application (Para 8) |
| 4. court's view on necessity of advocate commissioner (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. revision petition allowed (Para 12) |
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the Order dated October 26, 2022 passed in I.A.No. 1 of 2021 in A.S.No. 34 of 2021, on the file of 'Principal Subordinate Court, Salem', ['First Appellate Court' for convenience]
2. The revision petitioner herein is the appellant and the respondents herein are the respondents before the First Appellate Court. The revision petitioner herein is the plaintiff and the respondents herein are the defendants in O.S.No. 86 of 2015 on the file of I Additional District Munsif, Salem [Trial Court for short]. The parties will be denoted as per their array in the Original Suit.
3. The revision petitioner/plaintiff filed the Suit in O.S.No. 86 of 2015 before the Trial Court for declaration, mandatory injunction and delivery of possession against the defendants. The defendants filed their written 2/ statement. After full-fledged trial, the Trial Court dismissed th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
