SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 30081

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
HON`BLE Ms. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
G.REVATHI – Appellant
Versus
P.K.GANESHWAR – Respondent


O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been preferred to call for the records in S.T.C.No.337 of 2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palladam and quash the same.

2.The petitioner is the accused in a private complaint filed by the respondent against the petitioner for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned cheque on which the complaint has been filed by the respondent was barred by limitation and hence, it is not for any debt or legally enforceable liability as defined under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act; as per Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act, the agreement without consideration is void unless it is written and registered; on the date of issuance of the cheque, there was no legally enforceable debt or liability or drawing the cheque cannot amount to an acknowledgement of time barred debt; it has been held in number of cases that the complainant cannot take any action under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act unless there is any legally enforceable debt; even according to the case of the complainant for the loan advanced on 19.12.2013 t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top