SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 52726

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN
K.THIRUMALAIVADIVU – Appellant
Versus
S.RAJASEKARAN – Respondent


COMMON JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.)

These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are directed against the order passed by the trial Court in the Interlocutory Applications filed by the third party [second respondent in both the appeals], to raise attachment before judgment and succeeded.

2.The brief facts common to both the appeals are as follows:-

(i) One Rajasekaran, who is the first respondent in both the appeals alleged to have borrowed a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- on 16.04.2008 from one R.S.Gandhi, the plaintiff in O.S.No.46 of 2010. He has not repaid the loan amount, despite promise to pay the same with interest on demand, on executing a Pro-note. After issuance of the pre-suit notice, the suit in O.S.No.46 of 2010, for recovery of Rs.31,10,833/- was filed before the Principal District Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur.

(ii) Similar suit was instituted against Rajasekaran by K.Thirumalaivadivu, W/o.R.S.Gandhi, in O.S.No.47 of 2010, on the file of the Principal District Court, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur, alleging that he borrowed a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- on 22.05.2008 and promised to repay it with interest at Rs.1/- per Rs.100/- per month. Des

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top