SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 6086

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
K.T.SELVARAJ – Appellant
Versus
SUNDARI – Respondent


ORDER

This petition had been filed to call for the records in C.C.No.188 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Jayamkondam, Ariyalur District and quash the same.

2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner is the Accused in C.C.No.188 of 2018 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Jayamkondam, Ariyalur District.

3. It is the case of the Petitioner that he had filed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act in STC.No.708 of 2014. In that case, the Respondent herein is the Accused and when she was questioned, she denied the charge under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. Therefore, trial was ordered by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Jayamkondam, Ariyalur District. Accordingly witnesses were examined. The Accused was questioned under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. in STC.No.708 of 2014 and she had answered the same. At this stage, she filed a complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act against the Petitioner herein, in C.C.No.188 of 2018 on the ground that the cheques belonging to her in STC.No.708 of 2014 were misplaced and they were taken away by the Petitioner herein, based on which, the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top