Back
2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 41025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.10.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN Writ Petition Nos. 1057, 2129, 2595, 7922, 13657, 13659, 16707, 16712, 17862, 17965, 20580, 20638 and 21624 of 2021 ---
WP No. 1057 of 2021 K.B. Ravishankar .. Petitioner Versus
1. Union of India Rep., by General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai - 600001.
2. The Honourable Ombudsman C/o.Reserve Bank of India (Banking Office)
Fort Glacis, Rajaji Salai Chennai 600001.
3. The Nodal Officer SBI Card P.O. Bag No. 28, GPO New Delhi – 110 001
4. The President Collections SBI Cards and Payment Service Private Limited 10th Floor, TVH Agnito Park, Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kadanchavadi Chennai – 600 096 ..Respondents WP No. 2129 of 2021 J. Sathiyaraj .. Petitioner Versus
1. Union of India Rep., by General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai - 600001.
2. The Banking Ombudsman C/o.Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai 600001.
3. The Nodal Officer Axis Bank Limited Circle Circle Office
2nd Floor, No. 3, Club House Road Chennai – 600 002
4. The Manager Axis Bank Limited, Avadi Branch No. 199, Poovai Road Thiruvallur, Chennai – 600 024 ..Respondents WP No. 2595 of 2021 P. Kumar .. Petitioner Versus
1. Union of India Rep., by General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai - 600001.
2. The Banking Ombudsman C/o.Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai 600001.
3. The Nodal Officer Axis Bank Limited Chennai Circle Office
2nd Floor, No. 3, Club House Road Chennai – 600 002
4. The Manager Axis Bank Limited S – 1, New Housing Unit Near New Bus Stand Dharapuram Tirupur – 638 656 ..Respondents WP No. 7922 of 2021 J. Raja Mohammed .. Petitioner Versus
1. Union of India Rep by General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai - 600001.
2. The Banking Ombudsman (NBFC)
C/o.Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Rajaji Salai Chennai 600001.
3. The Nodal Officer Indostar Capital Finance Limited Indostar Tower
22 & 23, Venkatanarayana Road T. Nagar, Chennai – 600 017
4. The Branch Manager Indostar Capital Finance Limited No. 23-B, T.K. Nambi Street Near Raymond Showroom Kancheepuram – 631 501 ..Respondents WP No. 13657 of 2021 K.B. Ravishankar .. Petitioner Versus
1. Union of India Rep., by General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai - 600001.
2. The Banking Ombudsman C/o.Reserve Bank of India (Banking Office)
Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai 600001.
3. The Nodal Officer HDFC Bank Limited Pioneer Kushal Towers First Floor, A Wing, 96, Anna Salai Chennai – 600 002
4. The Manager HDFC Bank Limited No. 759, ITC Centre Anna Salai Chennai – 600 002 ..Respondents WP No. 13659 of 2021 C. Sathishkumar .. Petitioner Versus
1. Union of India Rep. by General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai - 600001.
2. The Banking Ombudsman C/o. Reserve Bank of India (Banking Office)
Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai 600001.
3. The Principal Nodal Officer Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Infinity, 5th Floor, Zone - II Bldg No. 21, Infinity Park General AK Vaidya Marg Malad(E), Mumbai – 400 097
4. The Manager Kotak Mahindra Bank Kodambakkam Branch No.555, Capital Towers Anna Salai, Teynampet Chennai - 600 018 .. Respondents WP No. 16707 of 2021 R. Murugesan .. Petitioner Versus
1. Union of India Rep. by General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai - 600001.
2. The Banking Ombudsman C/o. Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai 600001.
3. The Principal Nodal Officer IndusInd Bank Limited
2nd Floor, Building No. 7 Solitaire Corporate Park Chakala, Andheri (E)
Mumbai – 400 093
4. The Manager IndusInd Bank Limited G.N. Chetty Road Office New No. 34, Old No. 115 & 116 G.N. Chetty Road, T. Nagar Chennai 600 017 .. Respondents WP No. 16712 of 2021 M. Pandiarajan .. Petitioner Versus
1. Union of India Rep. by General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai - 600001.
2. The Banking Ombudsman C/o. Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai 600001.
3. The Principal Nodal Officer Axis Bank Limited Circle Office - II Floor No.3, Club House Road Chennai - 600 002
4. The Manager Axis Bank Limited
6-A, 2nd Floor, Centennial Square Dr. Ambethkar Road, Kodampakkam Chennai - 600 024 .. Respondents WP No. 17862 of 2021 S. Mayilraj .. Petitioner Versus
1. Union of India Rep. by General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai - 600001.
2. The Banking Ombudsman C/o. Reserve Bank of India (Banking Office)
Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai 600001.
3. The Principal Nodal Officer Yes Bank Ground Floor No. 143/1, Uttamar Gandhi Salai Nungampakkam Chennai – 600 034
4. The Manager Yes Bank Ground Floor, Dass Indian Tower Second Line Beach, Rajaji Salai Chennai – 600 001 .. Respondents WP No. 17965 of 2021 M.H. Mohamed Ghani .. Petitioner Versus
1. Union of India Rep. by General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai - 600001.
2. The Honourable Ombudsman C/o.Reserve Bank of India (Banking Office)
Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai 600001.
3. The Nodal Officer SBI Card P.O. Bag No. 28, GPO New Delhi – 110 001
4. The President Collections SBI Cards and Payment Service Private Limited 10th Floor, TVH Agnito Park, Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kadanchavadi Chennai – 600 096 ..Respondents WP No. 20580 of 2021 A. Ashok Kumar .. Petitioner Versus
1. Union of India Rep. by General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai - 600001.
2. The Banking Ombudsman C/o.Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai 600001.
3. The Principal Nodal Officer Axis Bank Private Limited Circle Office - II Floor No.3, Club House Road Chennai – 600 002
4. The Manager Axis Bank Private Limited
2/19, 5th Cross Street United India Colony, Kodambakkam Chennai – 600 024 ..Respondents WP No. 20638 of 2021 S. Jaikumar .. Petitioner Versus
1. Union of India Rep. by General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai - 600001.
2. The Banking Ombudsman (NBFC)
C/o.Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai 600001.
3. The Principal Nodal Officer HDB Financial Services Limited
3rd Floor, Murugesa Naicker Office Complex New No.128/4F, Old No. 53A Greams Road, Chennai – 600 006
4. The Manager HDB Financial Services Limited
3rd Floor, Murugesa Naicker Office Complex New No.128/4F, Old No. 53A Greams Road, Chennai – 600 006 ..Respondents WP No. 21624 of 2021 S. Ilakkia .. Petitioner Versus
1. The General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai - 600001.
2. The Banking Ombudsman C/o.Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Kamarajar Salai Chennai 600001.
3. The Principal Nodal Officer Axis Bank Private Limited Circle Office - II Floor No.3, Club House Road Chennai – 600 002
4. The Manager Axis Bank Private Limited
6-A, 2nd Floor, Centennial Square Dr. Ambethkar Road, Kodampakkam Chennai – 600 024 ..Respondents WP No. 1057 of 2021:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to take action against the fourth respondent to follow the due process of law, regarding collection of loan amount, as guided by Reserve Bank of India forthwith by considering petitioner's complaint dated 12.11.2020.
WP No. 2129 of 2021:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to take action against the fourth respondent to follow the due process of law, regarding collection of loan amount, as guided by Reserve Bank of India forthwith by considering petitioner's complaint dated 13.01.2021.
WP No. 2595 of 2021:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to take action against the fourth respondent to follow the due process of law, regarding collection of loan amount, as guided by Reserve Bank of India forthwith by considering petitioner's complaint dated 01.12.2020.
WP No. 7922 of 2021:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to take action against the fourth respondent to follow the due process of law, regarding collection of loan amount, as guided by Reserve Bank of India forthwith by considering petitioner's complaint dated 04.03.2021.
WP No. 13657 of 2021:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to take action against the fourth respondent to follow the due process of law, regarding collection of loan amount, as guided by Reserve Bank of India forthwith by considering petitioner's complaint dated 09.03.2021.
WP No. 13659 of 2021:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to take action against the fourth respondent to follow the due process of law, regarding collection of loan amount, as guided by Reserve Bank of India forthwith by considering petitioner's complaint dated 08.06.2021.
WP No. 16707 of 2021:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to take action against the fourth respondent to follow the due process of law, regarding collection of loan amount, as guided by Reserve Bank of India forthwith by considering petitioner's complaint dated 14.07.2021.
WP No. 16712 of 2021:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to take action against the fourth respondent to follow the due process of law, regarding collection of loan amount, as guided by Reserve Bank of India forthwith by considering petitioner's complaint dated 17.07.2021.
WP No. 17862 of 2021:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to take action against the fourth respondent to follow the due process of law, regarding collection of loan amount, as guided by Reserve Bank of India forthwith by considering petitioner's complaint dated
07.08.2021.
WP No. 17965 of 2021:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to take action against the fourth respondent to follow the due process of law, regarding collection of loan amount, as guided by Reserve Bank of India forthwith by considering petitioner's complaint dated
05.08.2021.
WP No. 20580 of 2021:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to take action against the fourth respondent to follow the due process of law, regarding collection of loan amount, as guided by Reserve Bank of India forthwith by considering petitioner's complaint dated 04.09.2021.
WP No. 20638 of 2021:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to take action against the fourth respondent to follow the due process of law, regarding collection of loan amount, as guided by Reserve Bank of India forthwith by considering petitioner's complaint dated
02.09.2021 WP No. 21624 of 2021:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to take action against the fifth respondent to follow the due process of law, regarding collection of loan amount, as guided by Reserve Bank of India forthwith by considering petitioner's complaint dated
07.09.2021.
WP No. 1057 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr. M. Govindarajan For Respondents : No appearance for R1 & R2 Mr. S. Sethuraman for R3 & R4 WP No. 2129 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr. M. Govindarajan For Respondents : No appearance for R1 & R2 Mr. R. Sreedhar for R3 WP No. 2595 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr. M. Govindarajan For Respondents : No appearance for R1 & R2 Mr. R. Sreedhar for R3 Mr. M. Karthikeyan for R4 WP No. 7922 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr. M. Govindarajan For Respondents : No appearance WP No. 13657 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr. M. Govindarajan For Respondents : No appearance for R1 – R3 Mr. S. Krishna for R4 WP No. 13659 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr. M. Govindarajan For Respondents : No appearance for R1 - R3 Mr.N.S. Sivakumar for R4 WP No. 16707 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr. M. Govindarajan For Respondents : No appearance for R1 & R2 Mr. T. Dhanyakumar for R3 WP No. 16712 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr. M. Govindarajan For Respondents : No appearance for R1 & R2 Mr. R. Sreedhar for R3 WP No. 17862 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr. M. Govindarajan For Respondents : No appearance WP No. 17965 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr. M. Govindarajan For Respondents : Mr. Sethuraman for R4 WP No. 20580 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr. M. Govindarajan For Respondents : No appearance for R1 – R3 Mr. M. Karthikeyan for R4 WP No. 20638 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr. M. Govindarajan For Respondents : No appearance WP No. 21624 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr. M. Govindarajan
COMMON ORDER
In all these writ petitions, the prayer sought for is to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to take action against the banks or financial institutions which have lent money to the respective petitioner, to follow the due process of law, regarding collection of loan amount, as guided by Reserve Bank of India forthwith based on their complaints.
2. The petitioners in these writ petitions have availed credit card/
term loan or housing loan facility from the respective bank. According to the petitioners, they have repaid the amount periodically, however, owing to pandemic situation, they could not pay the loan amount. Notwithstanding the adverse financial situation faced by the petitioners, the recovery personnel attached to the lending banks / financial institutions frequently called upon them and demanded the repayment of the entire balance amount by slapping exorbitant interest. Unable to sustain the frequent threats unleashed by the recovery agents appointed by the lending banks/financial institutions to collect the loan amount, the petitioners have given complaints to the Banking Ombudsman seeking to take appropriate action against the lending banks/ financial institutions for the unfair and unreasonable practice adopted in the matter of recovering the loan amount through threat and coercion. According to the petitioners, the complaints given by them have not been considered so far and therefore, they have filed these writ petitions.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the Honourable Supreme Court, time and again, held that private banks should not resort to collect the borrowed amount by adopting third degree methods and such a practice has been deprecated. To substantiate such contention, he placed reliance on the order dated 26.02.2007 passed by the Honourable Supreme Court in Appeal (Crl) No. 267 of 2007 in the case of (Manager, ICICI Bank Limited vs. Prakash Kaur and others) wherein it was held that Banks have to be held vicariously liable for such acts of the agents engaged by them and that the recovery of loan or vehicles has to be done only through legal means and Banks cannot employ goondas to take possession by force. In the present case, according to the counsel for the petitioners, the lending banks/ financial institutions engaged goondas and hooligans to collect the loan amount from the petitioners without following the due process of law and therefore, the petitioners have been constrained to give a complaint to the Banking Ombudsman. However, no action has been taken on the complaints given by the petitioners, hence, the learned counsel for the petitioners prayed this Court to issue appropriate direction to the lending banks/financial institutions to recover the loan amount only by adopting due process of law.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the respective banks/financial institutions vehemently contend that the banks/financial institutions have not adopted any such unlawful method in collecting the loan amount. The petitioners, having availed the term loan/credit card facility or housing loan have failed to repay the loan amount. The loan amount was directed to be repaid by the bank in a lawful manner and the question of exerting pressure towards the petitioners through third degree method does not arise. The petitioners have availed huge amount and committed default in payment of loan amount. When the petitioners committed default in payment of the loan amount, the lending banks/financial institutions lawfully demanded the repayment of the loan amount. However, the petitioners have raised various allegations as against the lending banks/financial institutions in the matter of collection of the loan amount. It is vehemently contended by the counsel for the lending banks/financial institutions that the present attempt on the part of the petitioners, in filing these writ petitions, is to throttle the legitimate process initiated by the lending banks/financ
