2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 28414
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.JEYAMURUGAN – Appellant
Versus
DR.T.CHANDRAN – Respondent
CMA(MD) 854 2017
C.M.A(MD)No.854 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Reserved on : 02.08.2023
Delivered on : 05.09.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
C.M.A(MD)No.854 of 2017
M.Jeyamurugan
: Appellant/Petitioner
Vs.
1.T.Chandran
2.Claims Manager,
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co., Ltd.,
142/7, I Floor, Sri Bajaj Arcade,
Trivandrum Road, Murugankurichi,
Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli 627 002. : Respondents/Respondents
PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of
Motor Vehicles Act, against the fair and decreetal order, dated
14.03.2017 made in M.C.O.P.No.92 of 2014 on the file of the Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate), Virudhunagar
District at Srivilliputhur.
For Appellant : Mr.N.Tamil Mani
For Respondents : Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu, for R1.
: Mr.V.Sakthivel, for R2.
1/11
C.M.A(MD)No.854 of 2017
J U D G M E N T
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the award
passed in M.C.O.P.No.92 of 2014, dated 14.03.2017 on the file of the
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Chief Judicial Magistrate),
Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur.
2. The appellant/claimant, who was awarded with compensation of
Rs.30,820/- for the injuries suffered by him consequent to an accident
occurred on 09.12.2013, challenged the quantum of compensation
awarded at by the Tribunal and claimed enhancement of the same.
3. It is not in dispute that in an accident occurred on 09.12.2013,
the appellant had sustained the following injuries :
(i) Abrasion over parietal Scalp present.
(ii) Abrasion Right Gluteal region with tenderness, Edema.
(iii) Sutured would Right thigh Lower third, Lateral aspect.
(iv) Sutured wound Right leg middle third anterolateral.
(v) Edema Left Ankle present with Tenderness Left Leg.
2/11
C.M.A(MD)No.854 of 2017
4. It is evident from Ex.P.8/out-patient card and Ex.P.7/Accident
Register extract that after the accident, he was taken to Government
Hospital, Rajapalayam and after first-aid treatment, he was referred to
Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai for further treatment.
5. It is the specific case of the claimant that he was admitted in
G.V.Ortho Centre, Rajapalayam on 09.12.2013 and was discharged on
14.12.2013. It is evident from Ex.P.9 that he was given conservative
management for multiple injuries sustained in the accident occurred on
09.12.2013.
6. It is the further case of the claimant that he was taking
out-patient treatment continuously in G.V.Ortho Centre, Rajapalayam;
that subsequently, he was admitted in A.R.Hospital, Madurai on
08.09.2014 for left knee ligament injury and after surgery, he was
discharged on 11.09.2014; that the claimant had spent more than
Rs.1,50,000/- for medical expenses; that the claimant, after the treatment,
is unable to sit, stand, walk, squat and cycling; that he has suffered
permanent disability and that therefore, he was not in a position to do any
work as before.
3/11
C.M.A(MD)No.854 of 2017
7. The defence of the second respondent/insurer is that the
claimant has suffered only simple injuries in the accident occurred on
09.12.2013; that the claimant, after treatment has completely recovered
from the injuries; that the complainant's contention that he had ligament
injury on his left knee and got in-patient treatment and underwent
surgery, has no connection whatever with the injuries sustained in the
accident occurred on 09.12.2013 and that therefore, the claimant is not
entitled to claim any amount for the disability allegedly sustained due to
left knee ligament injury and for the medical expenses incurred with
respect to the same.
8. The claimant has produced MRI Scan report, Referral Slip
issued by the G.V.Ortho Centre, Rajapalayam, Discharge Summary
issued by the A.R. Hospital, Madurai, Medical prescri