SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 27223

MADRAS HIGH COURT
V.SENTHILBALAJI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP BY ITS, – Respondent
CRL OP(MD) 14402 2022



Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14402 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.08.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14402 of 2022

and

Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.9286 & 9287 of 2022

V.Senthilbalaji

...Petitioners

vs.

1.The State rep by

Inspector of Police,

Thanthonimalai Police Station,

Karur

Crime No.92 of 2019

2.Chinnadurai,

Sub-Inspector of Police,

Thanthonimalai Police Station,

Karur.

...Respondents

PRAYER:

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to the chargesheet in

C.C.No.98 of 2020 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I,

Karur and quash the same as against the petitioner.

For Petitioners

: Mr.Isac Mohanlal, Senior counsel,

for Mr.Baranikumar.N

Page No.1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14402 of 2022

For Respondents

: Mr.E.Raj Thilak

Additional Public Prosecutor, for R1

ORDER

This criminal original petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in

CC.No. 98 of 2020 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I,

Karur

2. Heard Mr.Isac Mohanlal, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and

the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent and also

perused the materials available on record.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 25.03.2019, at about 12.00 pm,

the petitioner and others entered into the Collector's Office in their vehicles

along with the Karur Constituency Parliamentary candidate. At that point of

time, only three cars were allowed to accompany the candidate and inspite of

the same, the fourth vehicle was brought and when the same was questioned by

the second respondent, the petitioner was alleged to have threatened him and

forcibly entered into the office. Based on the complaint given by the second

respondent, FIR was registered in Crime No.92 of 2018. The investigation was

conducted and the final report was also filed before the Court below and it was

taken on file in C.C.No.98 of 2020. The Court below has taken cognizance for

Page No.2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14402 of 2022

the offence under Section 353 and 506(1) of IPC, Section 4AA(1a) and 4AA(4)

of Tamil Nadu Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1959 and

Section 130 of Representation of People Act, 1951.

4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and

also the fact that the entire incident had taken place during the election time and

had happened at a spur of moment, the case can be brought within the scope of

Section 95 of IPC and hence, no useful purpose will be served by making the

accused persons undergo the trial.

5. In view of the above, this criminal original petition is allowed and

accordingly, the proceedings in CC.No. 98 of 2020 pending on the file of the

learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur, is hereby quashed. Consequently, the

connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

10.08.2023

Index

: Yes/No

Internet

: Yes/No

Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order

nsa

Page No.3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14402 of 2022

N. ANAND VENKATESH,

J.

nsa

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14402 of 2022

and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.9286 & 9287 of 2022

10.08.2023

Page No.4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top