MADRAS HIGH COURT
V.SENTHILBALAJI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP BY ITS, – Respondent
CRL OP(MD) 14402 2022
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14402 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14402 of 2022
and
Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.9286 & 9287 of 2022
V.Senthilbalaji
...Petitioners
vs.
1.The State rep by
Inspector of Police,
Thanthonimalai Police Station,
Karur
Crime No.92 of 2019
2.Chinnadurai,
Sub-Inspector of Police,
Thanthonimalai Police Station,
Karur.
...Respondents
PRAYER:
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to the chargesheet in
C.C.No.98 of 2020 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I,
Karur and quash the same as against the petitioner.
For Petitioners
: Mr.Isac Mohanlal, Senior counsel,
for Mr.Baranikumar.N
Page No.1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14402 of 2022
For Respondents
: Mr.E.Raj Thilak
Additional Public Prosecutor, for R1
ORDER
This criminal original petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in
CC.No. 98 of 2020 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I,
Karur
2. Heard Mr.Isac Mohanlal, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and
the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent and also
perused the materials available on record.
3. The case of the prosecution is that on 25.03.2019, at about 12.00 pm,
the petitioner and others entered into the Collector's Office in their vehicles
along with the Karur Constituency Parliamentary candidate. At that point of
time, only three cars were allowed to accompany the candidate and inspite of
the same, the fourth vehicle was brought and when the same was questioned by
the second respondent, the petitioner was alleged to have threatened him and
forcibly entered into the office. Based on the complaint given by the second
respondent, FIR was registered in Crime No.92 of 2018. The investigation was
conducted and the final report was also filed before the Court below and it was
taken on file in C.C.No.98 of 2020. The Court below has taken cognizance for
Page No.2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14402 of 2022
the offence under Section 353 and 506(1) of IPC, Section 4AA(1a) and 4AA(4)
of Tamil Nadu Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1959 and
Section 130 of Representation of People Act, 1951.
4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and
also the fact that the entire incident had taken place during the election time and
had happened at a spur of moment, the case can be brought within the scope of
Section 95 of IPC and hence, no useful purpose will be served by making the
accused persons undergo the trial.
5. In view of the above, this criminal original petition is allowed and
accordingly, the proceedings in CC.No. 98 of 2020 pending on the file of the
learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur, is hereby quashed. Consequently, the
connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
10.08.2023
Index
: Yes/No
Internet
: Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order
nsa
Page No.3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14402 of 2022
N. ANAND VENKATESH,
J.
nsa
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14402 of 2022
and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.9286 & 9287 of 2022
10.08.2023
Page No.4/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.