SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 27563

MADRAS HIGH COURT
The Official Liquidator, High Court of Madras – Appellant
Versus
Mr.G.Manikandan, Ex-Director, S/o.G.Govindarajan – Respondent
COMP.A 42 2022



Comp.A.No.42 of 2022

in C.P.No.225 of 2011

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

This Application has been filed by the Official Liquidator under Section

460 (4) of the Companies Act, read with rules 9, 11(b) of the Companies

(Court) Rules 1959, seeking for the following prayers:

(a) to take his report on record;

(b)to permit the Official Liquidator to break open the lock at the

registered office premises;

(c) to make inventory of the assets lying there at and end also to value

the movable / immovable assets by engaging the services of ITCOT,

Consultancy & Services Ltd;

(d) to permit the Official Liquidator to pay the valuation charges and

other incidental charges from the funds of the Company in Liquidation.

2.Learned Official Liquidator would submit that this Court by order

dated 12.01.2018 in C.P.No.225 of 2011, appointed Official Liquidator as

Provisional Liquidator of the M/s.Chitra Constructions Private Limited., with

the directions to take charge of all the assets and effects of the said company.

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3.Learned Official Liquidator would further submit that the registered

office of the Company in liquidation functioning at Flat Nos.207 & 208, No.8,

Chitra Avenue, Choolaimedu High Road, Chennai, at present was in locked

condition. Hence, the present application has been filed seeking to break open

the lock at the registered office premises.

4.Learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit

that he has no objection in allowing the present application.

5.Learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent would submit that the

said property belongs to the 3rd respondent and for the past four years, the said

property has been kept locked and he prayed to handover the possession of the

property to the 3rd respondent and he would also submit that he has filed an

appropriate application in this regard. He would further submit that he has no

objection in allowing the present application.

6.Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing for either parties and

perusal of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the

application, this Court is inclined to allow the present application.

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

7.Accordingly, this application is allowed, directing the Official

Liquidator to verify the title deeds of the said properties and submit the report

after compliance.

17.03.2023

rst

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

rst

Comp.A.No.42 of 2022

in C.P.No.225 of 2011

17.03.2023

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top