2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 28288
MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.S.DHAKSHINAMOORTHY – Appellant
Versus
H.DAMODAR – Respondent
CRL A 682 2021
Crl.A.No.682 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON : 08.03.2023
PRONOUNCED ON: 14.03.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
Crl.A.No.682 of 2021
K.S.Dhakshinamoorthy ...
Appellant
Vs.
1.H.Damodar
2.State Represented by
The Public Prosecutor,
Combatore – 18.
... Respondents
PRAYER: This Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 378 of
Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the IV
Additional District & Sessions Judge at Coimbatore in Criminal Appeal
No.163 of 2020 dated 04.10.2021 in reversing the well considered
judgment of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.2, Magisterial
Level at Coimbatore in C.C.No.93 of 2018 dated 06.08.2020.
For Appellant
...
Mr.V.Raghavachari,
Senior counsel
For Respondent No.1
...
Mr.S.Sathish
for Mr.A.G.Sampath Kumar
For Respondent No.2
...
Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan
Additional Public Prosecutor
Page 1 of 14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.682 of 2021
JUDGMENT
Challenging the impugned judgment dated 04.10.2021 passed in
Criminal Appeal No.163 of 2020 by the IV Additional District & Sessions
Judge at Coimbatore reversing the judgment dated 06.08.2020 passed in
C.C.No.93 of 2018 by the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.2,
Magisterial Level at Coimbatore.
2.The case of the complainant is that the complainant is the father-
in-law of one deceased Chandrasekar. His wife Chandra is the daughter of
the complainant. After his death, his wife Chandra and her daughter
Ishwarya are the legal heirs of the deceased Chandrasekar. The accused has
to pay a huge sum of money to the deceased Chandrasekar. After his death,
this fact came to the knowledge of the complainant and his daughter
Chandra. When they contacted the accused, the accused admitting his
liability issued a cheque bearing No.795380 dated 17.08.2017 drawn on
Andhara Bank, P.N.Pudur Branch, Coimbatore for a sum of Rs.25,00,000/-.
On 24.08.2017, the cheque was presented for collection and the same was
returned as insufficient funds. Again at the request of the accused, the
Page 2 of 14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.682 of 2021
complainant presented the cheque on 27.09.2017 and the same was
returned again on 28.09.2017 as insufficient funds. After issuing legal
notice, the complainant filed a complaint in C.C.No.93 of 2018 before the
Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.2 @ Magisterial Level,
Coimbatore, for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act.
3.Before the trial Court, the complainant examined himself as PW1
and filed six documents as Ex.P1 to Ex.P6. On the side of the accused, no
oral evidence has been examined and filed one document as Ex.D1.
4.The trial Court, after trial on considering the evidence of the
parties, found guilty and convicted the accused for the offence under
Section 138 of N.I.Act and sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for
a period of six months and also directed to pay a compensation of
Rs.25,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of
cheque to the complainant within one month from the date of judgment, in
default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months.
Page 3 of 14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.682 of 2021
Aggrieved against the same, the accused prepared an appeal in C.A.No.163
of 2020 before the IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore.
The learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, after considering
the records and the evidence adduced by the parties, acquitted the accused
and set aside the order passed by the trial Court in C.C.No.93 of 2018.
5.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the
Judgment of the appellate judge is contrary to the facts and law. The
signature in the cheque is not disputed by the accused. Section 139 of