2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 27505
MADRAS HIGH COURT
E.CHAKRAVARTHY – Appellant
Versus
N.RATHINAVEL – Respondent
CS 47 2020
C.S.No.47 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 10..10..2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
Civil Suit No.47 of 2020
and
O.A.Nos.77 & 78 of 2020
E.Chakravarthy
... Plaintiff
-Versus-
1.N.Rathinavel
2.Valarmathi
... Defendants
Suit filed under Oder VII Rule 1 of the Code of civil Procedure r/w Order
IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules praying to pass a judgment and decree of
permanent injunction as against the defendants 1 and 2, their men, agents,
servants or any other person or persons claiming for, through or under them or on
behalf of them from disturbing the plaintiff in the peaceful use, enjoyment and
possession of the suit schedule properties which are situated in Chennai District,
Thiruvanmiyur Village, Kannappa Nagar Extension, comprised in Town Survey
field numbers 158 and 157 and bearing Plot Numbers 33 & 25 measuring an
extent of 2520 square feet and 2438 square feet respectively; permanent
injunction as against the defendants 1 and 2, their men, agents servants or any
other person or persons claiming for, through or under them or on behalf of them
from causing any disturbance to the construction activity which is being carried
out by the plaintiff by employing his men and servants in the suit schedule
1 of 12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S.No.47 of 2020
properties which are situated in Chennai District, Thiruvanmiyur Village,
Kannappa Nagar Extension, comprised in Town Survey Field Numbers 158 &
157 bearing Plot Numbers 33 & 25, measuring an extent of 2520 square feet and
2438 square feet respectively; and for costs.
For Plaintiff
: Mr.C.P.Hemkumar for
Mr.A.Sathiyamurthi
For Defendants
: Set Ex-parte
JUDGEMENT
Suit is for a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 and
2, their men, agents, servants or any other person or persons claiming for,
through or under them or on behalf of them from disturbing the plaintiff in the
peaceful use, enjoyment and possession of the suit schedule properties;
restraining defendants 1 and 2, their men, agents servants or any other person or
persons claiming for, through or under them or on behalf of them from causing
any disturbance to the construction activity which is being carried out by the
plaintiff by employing his men and servants in the suit schedule properties; and
also for costs.
2 of 12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S.No.47 of 2020
2. The plaintiff claims to be absolute owner of the suit schedule items by
virtue of purchase from one K.Anbazhagan on 18.11.2019 and 18.12.2019
respectively. He was put in possession of the suit items on the date of execution of
the sale deeds. According to the plaintiff, the defendants have prevented him
from carrying out the construction activities in the suit properties and therefore,
he made a complaint to the police on 19.01.2020 as against the defendants. On
20.01.2020 also, the defendant attempted to prevent the plaintiff from carrying
out construction activities. On 27.01.2020, the plaintiff and his son were
prevented from entering into the suit schedule properties. On 28.01.2020, the
defendants entered into a wordy quarrel with the son of the plaintiff and
prevented the construction activities. Hence, the suit.
3. The defendants 1 and 2 have filed their written statement denying the
averments made in the plaint and inter alia contending that did not have any
semblance of right over the property in Old S.Nos.93/3 & 935/5 belonging to
them.
4. Based on the pleadings the following issues were framed for trial:
(1) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to get an order
of permanent injunction as against the defendants 1 and
3 of 12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S.No.47 of 2020
2 from disturbing the plaintiff in the peaceful use,
enjoyment and possession of the suit schedule properties
which are situated in Chennai District, Thiruvanmiyur